What DAW do you use?

Discussion in 'Recording Studio' started by BMFan30, Jun 18, 2021.

  1. DudeManBrother

    DudeManBrother Hey...how did everybody get in my room?

    Messages:
    2,650
    Likes Received:
    2,695
    Joined:
    May 3, 2014
    Location:
    Seattle
    They’re all so comprehensive now that it really doesn’t matter which one you get; just make sure to really learn it. I use Reaper primarily, then Logic for certain sound design parts, and occasionally I’ll run stems through Harrison Mixbus. I could learn Logic better and be content with using it, but I love Reaper and can work fast in it, so that’s my go-to. If you’ve already got 3rd party plugins that you use then Reaper is a no brainer IMO. It is the least CPU intensive daw by far, and the download size is insignificant. The fact that it’s so feature laden and customizable in such a small download is baffling.
     
    MetalheadMC and BMFan30 like this.
  2. sakeido

    sakeido Contributor

    Messages:
    7,353
    Likes Received:
    2,908
    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2006
    Location:
    Calgary AB
    imo switching DAWs just gets harder and harder as time goes on. As much as I bitch about Cubase, I'm really fluent in it and can work very quickly.

    Reaper is so different it feels like my workflow just comes to a screeching halt. I don't find it as intuitive and easy to pick up as
    which is bizarre choice, very non-traditional for a metal guitarist (as far as I can tell) but it's quick and easy to work in for composition. I don't think I'd want to do a mix and master in it but for actually slapping songs together it's great, and it has probably the best hardware controller options out there now if you want to get away from a mouse & keyboard. Hell you can get an Akai Force and ditch a PC altogether... that's basically Ableton, standalone, wrapped up in an amazing package. Stellar unit.
     
    drgamble and BMFan30 like this.
  3. Dayn

    Dayn SS.org Regular

    Messages:
    1,793
    Likes Received:
    833
    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2011
    Location:
    Brisbane, Australia
    Yeah I do a fair bit of electronic stuff too and I use a tonne of virtual instruments. But the overriding consideration was I could get the full version for very cheap, so that's all the thought I had behind that decision.
     
    BMFan30 likes this.
  4. BMFan30

    BMFan30 SS.org Regular

    Messages:
    626
    Likes Received:
    380
    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2021
    I have enough for sound design as well in my DAW now but I wanted something more for live recording to see if I would like the workflow better for metal.
     
  5. BMFan30

    BMFan30 SS.org Regular

    Messages:
    626
    Likes Received:
    380
    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2021
    This is purely for mixing? I've only read so little on it but have heard metal producers talking about it.

    Yep, the lightweight nature of it seems to attract me to Reaper. I have my own plugins already so hopefully this will help me ease into new DAW territory. People say a lot of good about Reaper but I haven't tried it since '07, I'm sure lots has changed since.
    This is important too, I don't like the sluggishness my other DAW geared towards sound design brings so maybe something else might be better for me, who knows.
     
  6. DudeManBrother

    DudeManBrother Hey...how did everybody get in my room?

    Messages:
    2,650
    Likes Received:
    2,695
    Joined:
    May 3, 2014
    Location:
    Seattle
    Harrison can do mixing and tracking, but I find it clunky, and they only allow 3rd party VST. I mostly only download AU (Mac) so it’s really only useful to me for the console color, and it’s nice to work on the console format sometimes. Now that SSL had updated their Bus Comp and Channel Strip with the new 360 software, I’m far less likely to open Harrison anymore. It does sound pretty cool, but it’s not always worth the hassle.

    Reaper definitely sounds right up your alley then. I love that there is only 1 track style that will accept any audio/video source. Arm the track and select the interface channel. It’s non destructive to audio files too, so you can cut up a track however you want, and just drag the beginning or end of the clip and all the track’s recorded audio will show back up. I find it very useful for editing snare miss hits and things like that. I’ll just cut out a good hit and move it over to the miss, then drag the file back across the cut portion of the good snare hit to have the original back in place.
     
    BMFan30 likes this.
  7. drgamble

    drgamble SS.org Regular

    Messages:
    492
    Likes Received:
    92
    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2011
    Location:
    New Orleans
    I have used Cubase(now Nuendo) and Pro Tools for so long that I just can't get into another DAW. They seem foreign to me and I usually don't want to futz around with learning a DAW while writing music. I went through the learning a DAW while trying to write music and mix for so long with Cubase that now I just know how to use it. I have set up macros for some things and I have gotten to a point that the DAW does not get in the way of my workflow. That being said, I have several friends that started off with Reaper and they feel the same way about Cubase. Reaper seems like a good pick if you are starting out and haven't used anything else. It is very cheap to maintain and will perform most of the functions needed. It does not have all of the functions of Nuendo. The MIDI functions alone are very mature and I find them easy to use and can get a project going fast. I have really tried to like Reaper, but I end up going back to Cubendo. I tried Pro Tools and I always get crashes, lose communication with MIDI controllers, and a whole host of other stuff that just brings me back to Cubendo.

    At the end of the day, find what works for you. Any DAW does the same thing, there are just different ways to do most things. Once you get things figured out, it is very hard to switch and be productive at the same time. The bottom line is that the best DAW is the one you know how to use.
     
  8. WarMachine

    WarMachine SS.org Regular

    Messages:
    2,191
    Likes Received:
    662
    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2012
    Location:
    Charleston, WV
    Agreed. This is how i landed on Reaper. I used Cakewalk and then Goldwave back in the day, then found Reaper. Haven't looked back.
     
    BMFan30 likes this.
  9. DrakkarTyrannis

    DrakkarTyrannis

    Messages:
    8,452
    Likes Received:
    5,708
    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2007
    Location:
    Maryland
    FL STUDIO GANG
     
    feilong29 and BMFan30 like this.
  10. bostjan

    bostjan MicroMetal Contributor

    Messages:
    17,103
    Likes Received:
    6,255
    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2005
    Location:
    St. Johnsbury, VT USA
    I use Studio One. I'm only a little proficient with it, but I tried Reaper and even after a week of playing with it, I still didn't feel comfortable navigating even basic edits. I only barely moved away from console recording back in 2015.
     
    BMFan30 likes this.
  11. Screwhead

    Screwhead SS.org Regular

    Messages:
    24
    Likes Received:
    16
    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2020
    I've been using Ableton since around 2006. Before that I used FruityLoops (before they called it FL Studio), and going back even further, I used to record guitar parts with a computer microphone by my amp using Windows Sound Recorder in Win 3.1 and bring them into Impulse Tracker. I also primarily made electronic music and DJ'd from around 2002 onward, so Ableton was a great tool. Extremely easy to make loops of melodies, drum loops, etc, and drag/rearange everything.
     
    BMFan30 likes this.
  12. thebeesknees22

    thebeesknees22 SS.org Regular

    Messages:
    1,036
    Likes Received:
    912
    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2019
    Location:
    Le baguette land, Canada
    cubase here after giving up on pro tools and logic. It's fine for me. Makes sense, and I like the logical editor a lot.

    But I'm watching studio one videos now and the basic workflow stuff looks pretty cool tbh

    I've been wanting to try ableton for non rock/metal stuff for a while, but I haven't got around to it yet.
     
    Randy and BMFan30 like this.
  13. Screwhead

    Screwhead SS.org Regular

    Messages:
    24
    Likes Received:
    16
    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2020
    Ableton is amazing! I've tried almost everything out there, including Logic, and Ableton IMO has the best workflow, as well as the name implies, being able to be used as a live tool. Each channel has loops you can program (for VSTs/MIDI) or audio clips you can launch (drum loops, movie samples, instrument loops, one-shots, whatever).

    It takes a little digging in, but it's absolutely incredible! Once I switched over to Ableton, I honestly don't think anything else will even come close for ease of use and the simplicity of being able to quickly throw together something and experiment live.
     
    BMFan30 and thebeesknees22 like this.
  14. littlebadboy

    littlebadboy SS.org Regular

    Messages:
    919
    Likes Received:
    670
    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2014
    Location:
    Midwestern USA
    Samplitude Music Studio.

    Why?
    I started with Magix Music Maker. Had everything I need. It was so easy to use. Then, I graduated from it and went to its big brother- The Samplitude Music Studio. Cheap, lots of freebies. Has everything I need.
     
    Randy and BMFan30 like this.
  15. eaeolian

    eaeolian Pictures of guitars I don't even own anymore! Super Moderator

    Messages:
    14,092
    Likes Received:
    1,662
    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2005
    Location:
    Woodbridge, VA
    Reaper is my jam. Has been since v0.9.
     
    WarMachine, c7spheres and BMFan30 like this.
  16. Voodoo Marshall

    Voodoo Marshall SS.org Regular

    Messages:
    18
    Likes Received:
    11
    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2014
    Location:
    Boston, MA
    GB and Logic but honestly, GB more than anything just b/c I know it. With Neural DSP plugins, good mics for vox and drum plugins, in addition to the GB onboard stuff, I can get it sounding good and as someone above said, I'm fluent in it. If I'm serious about something, I'll take the GB to Logic Pro and then send the file to my "real" producer friend to work it in Pro Tools. PT is soooo far above my pay grade.
     
    BMFan30 likes this.
  17. BMFan30

    BMFan30 SS.org Regular

    Messages:
    626
    Likes Received:
    380
    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2021
    So far what I've gathered is that:
    1. Reaper is very affordable, fast, lightweight, customizable, stripped down for simplicity but I may end up searching for ways on how to do things more than making actual music since it's very vanilla and needs scripts to do things to be set up how you want it.

    2. Studio One isn't too expensive, user friendly, feature rich, has a great looking UI but still lacks ways to do certain things.

    3. Cubase is stupid expensive but is very intuitive, good workflow but is a bit bloated but has been tried and tested longer than most DAWs.

    Am I right for assuming some of this based on stuff I've been reading lately? I'm still going to try a few of them to see which workflow suits me best or if I just need to stay in my DAW now because I know it best. Shopping for DAW features has me thinking maybe I need something else for recording metal easier. Maybe I'm wrong, don't know yet.
     
    Randy likes this.
  18. nickgray

    nickgray SS.org Regular

    Messages:
    947
    Likes Received:
    929
    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2008
    3rd party scripts are easy to find, and there's an internal package manager (ReaPack), so you can easily download them. By and large they just pop up in your actions list, and that's it really. There's no difficulty to it of any kind.

    That said, Reaper doesn't "need" user scripts. It has a monstrous amount of features available. It's vanilla in the sense that when you start up the new install, the default UI/UX is barebones.

    But that's the problem of every DAW - you first have to learn how to use them. It's the same with Reaper. It's just that the initial configuration that it comes with is more spartan.
     
    BMFan30 and c7spheres like this.
  19. BMFan30

    BMFan30 SS.org Regular

    Messages:
    626
    Likes Received:
    380
    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2021
    I got the ReaPack today along with some skins. Everything is still very confusing to me because it's a new DAW but I kind of got a couple of tracks going in my projects.

    I fucked it up heavily but I got 2 midi tracks going but I kept messing it up because I was accidentally zooming and sliding the midi clips in ways I didn't want to nor understand how I was messing it up. That's not Reapers fault of course, I'm just too new to it.

    Yeah sorry, that's exactly what I meant. Not that it lacks features, it's just not bloated which is why it's lightning fast. It's vanilla in a good way with less clutter.

    You're right, it is! When I was searching through Reaper info, it just seemed like you have to look for more tutorials because it was more confusing to some is the way some people came across to me when describing their Reaper experience.

    You do have to take months to years of searching like that to really get to grips and become proficient in it, I understand that. I do have crossover knowledge from other DAWs so hopefully I won't have to search too long.
     
  20. Krazy Kalle

    Krazy Kalle SS.org Regular

    Messages:
    81
    Likes Received:
    21
    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2016
    Location:
    Gießen - Hessen - Germany
    Same for me. Before I started recording, I searched "best free DAWs" and I read Cakewalk multiple times, tried it out and it worked pretty well. I still have some problems with it (like audio engine stutters when one track is on record, rarely shuts down when dealing with Spitfire Audio LABS and I have like half a second latency), but it was okay for recording some demos. I'm going to get a Focusrite Scarlett, which comes with Ableton Live Lite, then I'll test that DAW and one day when I have the money for a MAC, maybe I'm going to buy Logic Pro.
     
    BMFan30 likes this.

Share This Page