US Political Discussion: Trump Administration Edition (Rules in OP)

Discussion in 'Politics & Current Events' started by mongey, Mar 2, 2016.

  1. bostjan

    bostjan MicroMetal Contributor

    Messages:
    14,980
    Likes Received:
    3,128
    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2005
    Location:
    St. Johnsbury, VT USA
    The Supreme Court already ruled that the Executive branch cannot ignore a congressional subpoena during Nixon's investigation, so it IS bullshit that this is happening again.
     
    Randy likes this.
  2. Randy

    Randy Sous Chef Super Moderator

    Messages:
    21,105
    Likes Received:
    5,471
    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2006
    Location:
    The Electric City, NY
  3. narad

    narad Owned a Zune

    Messages:
    8,118
    Likes Received:
    7,545
    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2009
    Location:
    Tokyo
    Well, could be the same republicans that want confederate statues to stay up, so that's not really the best president to throw up for comparison.
     
    Rosal76, Thaeon, Randy and 4 others like this.
  4. ImNotAhab

    ImNotAhab ChronicUnderachiever

    Messages:
    665
    Likes Received:
    277
    Joined:
    May 19, 2012
    Location:
    Vancouver BC (ex-Limerick, Ireland)
    [​IMG]

    When they find a set of pyjamas with matching slippers made from the hides of missing camp counselors in that guy's closet I will not be super surprised.
     
    Adieu likes this.
  5. Ralyks

    Ralyks The One Who Knocks Contributor

    Messages:
    4,103
    Likes Received:
    879
    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2011
    Location:
    Dutchess County, NY
    So Trumps refusing to partake in the impeachment to defend himself, and just put tariffs on Brazil and Argentina for steel and aluminum.

    And it's only Monday.
     
  6. Drew

    Drew Forum MVP

    Messages:
    29,013
    Likes Received:
    4,567
    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2004
    Location:
    Somerville, MA
    Technically he reinstated tariffs that had been waived to allow time to negotiate. There's some method to his madness here, in that both countries have been significant beneficiaries of the escalating trade war between the US and China in that China has redirected soybean and other agricultural purchases to these two countries that had previously gone to the US, so presumably Trump is looking to hit them for that. That said... It's still kind of a stupid idea, and there's no causal mechanism that should make China start buying agri products from us instead, just because they now have steel tariffs. I'm not sure what Trump's end game is, maybe that he's hoping they'll agree to not sell to China if we roll back the tariffs...? That seems awfully hard to accomplish.

    Trump is refusing to participate in the House Judiciary Committee proceedings, on the grounds that the proceedings are so biased it's a waste of his time. That argument is going to be a lot harder to make in the Republican-controlled Senate, so I'll be curious what he chooses to do there. Or, rather, what excuse he gives for not agreeing to provide sworn testimony.
     
  7. spudmunkey

    spudmunkey SS.org Regular

    Messages:
    2,680
    Likes Received:
    2,694
    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2010
    Location:
    Near San Francisco
    ...or even so much as sending council to attend.
     
  8. tedtan

    tedtan SS.org Regular

    Messages:
    4,402
    Likes Received:
    898
    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2009
    Location:
    Never Neverland
    But I thought he wanted a trial. :scratch: :lol:
     
  9. Ralyks

    Ralyks The One Who Knocks Contributor

    Messages:
    4,103
    Likes Received:
    879
    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2011
    Location:
    Dutchess County, NY
    In the Republican-majority Senate, yes.
     
  10. dreamspace

    dreamspace SS.org Regular

    Messages:
    9
    Likes Received:
    17
    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2019
    Let's be real here, putting Trump on any stand or hearing would be a total disaster for him and the GOP.

    The undeniable truth is that Trump is a shitty liar, and that he instinctively lies about anything he's unsure of, or things he sees as a weakness. This is not political - it's just who he is . And he's been like that forever.

    Even hardcore Trump followers see that he's frequently embellishing stories, or just making shit up as he goes.

    And hell, even if he doesn't manage to incriminate himself, he's surely going to throw someone under the bus - which just creates more stress and division in his own camp.

    There are no good outcomes for Trump in a situation where he's under heavy scrutiny. Either he manages to screw himself over, or someone else.
     
    zappatton2 and tedtan like this.
  11. Randy

    Randy Sous Chef Super Moderator

    Messages:
    21,105
    Likes Received:
    5,471
    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2006
    Location:
    The Electric City, NY
    I think it was McGahn that appealed to Mueller, saying that Trump couldn't testify because it was 100% certain he would perjure himself because he can't string together a sentence without lying.

    That's absolutely indicative of a guy that's been coddled his whole life. I've said it before in here, the whole Mueller report is story after story of Trump standing on the ledge, about to commit some egregious crime and someone jumping infront of him the last second. Over and over. The Ukraine thing is a good example because everyone was speaking in vague terms and coded language to offer some plausible deniability on what they were asking for, but King Pudding Brain blurts it out in plain English.
     
    zappatton2 likes this.
  12. Ralyks

    Ralyks The One Who Knocks Contributor

    Messages:
    4,103
    Likes Received:
    879
    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2011
    Location:
    Dutchess County, NY
    And now he's saying he'd prefer to hold off trade talks with China until after 2020. And the DOW dropped 100 points thusly.
     
  13. vilk

    vilk Very Regular

    Messages:
    5,438
    Likes Received:
    1,881
    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2013
    Location:
    Chicago
  14. Adieu

    Adieu SS.org Regular

    Messages:
    762
    Likes Received:
    495
    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2010
    Location:
    Moscow
    Well, he's un-shot, alive, and he ain't fighting a nasty civil war

    ...they might have a point. If only because lowest common denominator if viewed very literally in a very specific context.
     
  15. Ralyks

    Ralyks The One Who Knocks Contributor

    Messages:
    4,103
    Likes Received:
    879
    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2011
    Location:
    Dutchess County, NY
    vilk likes this.
  16. Drew

    Drew Forum MVP

    Messages:
    29,013
    Likes Received:
    4,567
    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2004
    Location:
    Somerville, MA
    Dropped way more than 100 points (also, points are kind of irrelevant because it depends on the base - a 1,000 point drop would be nearly unprecedented in a day, but would only be about a 3.6% drop. Still big, but a thousand point drop isn't what it used to be.

    IMO, that's also a capitulation to political reality on his part.

    1) Trump wants a deal where he's the "winner." He's said he won't accept a fair or "even" deal.
    2) China wants a rollback of existing tariffs as part of any Phase 1 deal. Their growth is slowing, but their back isn't to the wall exactly here, so they have no incentive to sign a deal that hurts them.
    3) Unless they've been burying their head in the sand, they have no reason to expect a Democrat would be any easier on them than Trump in trade talks.
    4) They DO have reason to believe that an unnamed Democratic president would be more likely to honor terms of any Phase 1 deal than Trump, however, who has shown he's quick to tear up his own deals when it's politically expedient - see the USMCA and the Mexican border fiasco. In other words, they have an incentive NOT to make concessions to Trump if at all possible, because there's no guarantee those concessions will get them anywhere.
    5) Trump is also presumably well aware that any deal other than a clear "win" will open him to criticism from the left that his trade war was massively disruptive to American manufaturers and farmers, and he didn't even get anything in return for it. Signing even an "even" deal in the run-up to the 2020 election is going to open him to attack. It's in his best interest politically to stall, and instead talk about the "huge" deal he'll sign once re-elected.

    The incentives - IMO of course - on both sides are to hold off on any serious deal until after November 2020. The Chinese want to hold out for a negotiator they can actually trust, while Trump doesn't want to accept anything other than total capitulation from the Chinese for fear of looking like a "loser."

    The problem, of course, is that the incentives - again, IMO - are for Trump to keep upping the pressure on the Chinese in the interim in the hopes he DOES get them to capitulate, in that a clear "win" would be invaluable in 2020, and because he evidently legitimately believes tariffs don't hurt America and any economic slowdown is the Fed's fault, not his.

    That makes the most likely outcome of all of this no deal and a recession or market crash before the election. IMO, of course.
     
  17. Randy

    Randy Sous Chef Super Moderator

    Messages:
    21,105
    Likes Received:
    5,471
    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2006
    Location:
    The Electric City, NY
  18. tedtan

    tedtan SS.org Regular

    Messages:
    4,402
    Likes Received:
    898
    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2009
    Location:
    Never Neverland
    Yeah, so he claims.

    But I think that either 1) he would all out refuse to participate given the opportunity as Drew mentioned, or 2) end up perjuring himself under oath (which, incidentally, is the only thing they got Clinton on).

    Knowing Trump, he'll probably find a way to do both and then try to blame the democrats for his own incompetency.
     
  19. Drew

    Drew Forum MVP

    Messages:
    29,013
    Likes Received:
    4,567
    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2004
    Location:
    Somerville, MA
    Only thing I'll say for Trump in this context is, he HAS had to testify under oath on a number of occasions, and in the past he's been uncharacteristically tight lipped and limited in his responses. I'm sure he was coached, and a very real factor to consider is in the courtroom he likely believed he couldn't get away with just making shit up whereas as President he does seem to think there's a plausible argument to be made he's above the law.

    But, if forced to testify under oath in a Senate trial, he might be more restrained than we're accustomed. How that plays with his base, though...
     
  20. Ralyks

    Ralyks The One Who Knocks Contributor

    Messages:
    4,103
    Likes Received:
    879
    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2011
    Location:
    Dutchess County, NY
    Kamala Harris dropped out. About damn time.
    Even worse, Bloomberg already passed her in the polls and sits in 5th place. Damn.
     
    Adieu likes this.

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.