Well, I haven't posted in a while but I still lurk a lot. Here's my take:
...
Who was that masked man?


Nice post!
Well, I haven't posted in a while but I still lurk a lot. Here's my take:
...
Implicit in all of this is the assumption that someone from another country has exactly the same right to help as a citizen of this country. I simply don't agree with that. You can call me a racist or whatever "ist" or "phobia" word you want but you're wrong. I rent a room in my house to a black guy from Haiti (who also thinks the Somalian invasion around here is ridiculous). The best man at my wedding is gay. But just go ahead and call me a bigot or whatever, I don't care.
I rent a room in my house to a black guy from Haiti (who also thinks the Somalian invasion around here is ridiculous). The best man at my wedding is gay. But just go ahead and call me a bigot or whatever, I don't care.
Who was that masked man?
![]()
Nice post!
Implicit in all of this is the assumption that someone from another country has exactly the same right to help as a citizen of this country. I simply don't agree with that. You can call me a racist or whatever "ist" or "phobia" word you want but you're wrong. I rent a room in my house to a black guy from Haiti (who also thinks the Somalian invasion around here is ridiculous). The best man at my wedding is gay. But just go ahead and call me a bigot or whatever, I don't care.
Implicit in all of this is the assumption that someone from another country has exactly the same right to help as a citizen of this country. I simply don't agree with that. You can call me a racist or whatever "ist" or "phobia" word you want but you're wrong. I rent a room in my house to a black guy from Haiti (who also thinks the Somalian invasion around here is ridiculous). The best man at my wedding is gay. But just go ahead and call me a bigot or whatever, I don't care.
I mean, if you're making perjorative assumptions about an entire group of people based on their race and religions, then yes, that makes you racist and bigoted.
You are *literally* saying, "I'm not a bigot, I have a gay friend." I hope you at least realize how much of a cliché that is. You should have stopped after your first two sentences.
^You might as well have written "OK I admit I said something silly", because that's what we all just read.
Also, have you seen the NGDs on this site and how expensive they are? My assumption of the average age of a given user on here is definitely not 'teenaged'.
you're prioritizing and I think that's dumb.
I don't care.
"Taco trucks on every corner"it always boils down to an irrational fear - fear of the unknown, I guess?
I think I get where you're coming from, to a point. The way I was raised included this idea that you help your own first - and there's some value to that. If I've got $100 to donate, for example, I'll donate it to something that I know will benefit my own family and friends first - Like my family has dealt with cancer, and brittle bone syndrome, etc. so it wouldn't be a stretch to say that if I was going to offer anyone any type of support, then that's where it would go. Absolutely makes sense, and I agree with you on that point.
There's also value in saying that we shouldn't necessarily help any/every person or group that asks for help without considering the implications - without considering if there's a legitimate risk involved - and I get that too. I really do. It's a lot of the reason that I don't think very many people go far out of their way to help homeless people or addicts, there's a fear that this person will do more to damage your life than the amount of good you'll be able to do for them. I won't make any judgement as to whether or not that's right or wrong, but I understand it.
However -
I think that an anti-immigrant stance is based on a poor assessment of the level of risk involved compared to the amount of good it would do. I've run into a lot of people who were convinced that pretty much anyone who comes from outside of their country is dangerous by default- not because of race or anything, and to be honest, I don't fully know the reasons in ever case, but it always boils down to an irrational fear - fear of the unknown, I guess?
Part of the issue is that there are political forces that benefit from creating that narrative that foreigners are dangerous, and Trump is the obvious example.
I think that I understand you, and agree to some point that home, your own citizens, your allies, etc. - there's definitely a system of priorities in terms of who to help first, or who to protect, etc. It's my opinion (and likely that of the others here who are continuing the argument) that you've drawn that line in accordance with a sort of unrealistic xenophobia.
In other words- Yes, definitely protect your own first. But that doesn't mean closing the borders, because foreigners and other cultures are not dangerous as you're making them out to be.
The odds of getting in a car and dying are thousands of times higher than getting killed by a refugee and yet we drive millions of them every day. It's an absolutely irrational fear born out of xenophobia and nothing else.but the probability of being attacked by a refugee is zero if there are none. I like those odds better.
"Taco trucks on every corner"
The odds of getting in a car and dying are thousands of times higher than getting killed by a refugee. It's an absolutely irrational fear born out of xenophobia and nothing else.