The Downsides of Headless Guitars?

bostjan

MicroMetal
Contributor
Joined
Dec 7, 2005
Messages
21,322
Reaction score
13,380
Location
St. Johnsbury, VT USA
Holy crap some opinions flying at full mast here...

The Kiesels should be fine. Some headless designs are just shitty designs, so just because it's a headless, it shouldn't make it more difficult to set up, but it might, if it's a bear to set up. Same could be said for regular headed guitars with shit hardware on them, though.

As for headless guitars looking nerdy/dorky/dweeby, yes, but this also applies to most guitars these days. If you see a bloke playing a guitar, that bloke is evidently likely to be an opinionated knob like the rest of us guitar players, :lol:.
 

Emperoff

Not using 5150s
Contributor
Joined
Jul 24, 2005
Messages
7,292
Reaction score
8,726
Location
Spain
I don't play out so it's not a difficult decision for me

I do, hence having other preferences (equally as valid as yours).

So the moral is: Buy whatever guitar makes you happy and enjoy it. It's a good thing not everyone thinks the same way, so we can have goddamn variety.
 
Last edited:

Neon_Knight_

SS.org Regular
Joined
Nov 26, 2012
Messages
1,274
Reaction score
1,301
Location
England
The disadvantage is that most of them look like someone took a hacksaw to both ends.

Any "advantages" of a headless guitar that I've ever heard about can also be achieved with a well-designed standard guitar. The one exception is the lack of headstock to knock into stuff with, but that's easily resolved by not being clumsy / careless (if it was such an issue, surely headless guitars shouldn't have an upper horn either).
 

Tree

-________-
Joined
Jun 29, 2010
Messages
3,071
Reaction score
1,724
Location
Chicago, IL
I live in a smaller, pretty cramped apartment. Not having a headstock makes a huge difference.

Also, a properly designed headless will weigh significantly less than most standard guitars. So if you have neck/shoulder troubles it can be a big improvement. Similarly, a well made and thought out design should also have quality parts that aren’t any more difficult to work on than other hardware.
 

spudmunkey

SS.org Regular
Joined
Mar 7, 2010
Messages
7,922
Reaction score
13,752
Location
Near San Francisco
. The reasons I'm not into them are lack of trust in hanging them in a wall hanger, even with a wider stock area post-nut, just doesn't give confidence.
"String swing wall stand" could be one option. I think it can come in slat wall mount, too. A slight tilt back, so it's like a regular stand you can't trip over.

Screenshot_20230126-093541_Samsung Internet.jpg 118950_350_3db5e947_0787_4c84_aba0_5e50fd308c1f.jpg

I don't own a headless. And in fact my next guitar likely won't be...but would like to some day.

Right now, if I wanted to put a guitar case in my trunk, it has to go in at an angle, effectively taking up the entire trunk unless you're only taking small things with it. A headless case fits straight across nicely. A headless case is much more likely to fit into an airliner overhead compartment. No matter how much one can cite legislation or argue about what's "allowed", you're still at the mercy of geometry. With a normal guitar case with backpack straps, I have to awkwardly duck under doorways...not with a headless case.

A Strat is, what, 40"? A headless 25.5" scale guitar could be under 30"...that 25% reduction in length just feels so different in-hand.
 
Last edited:

The Monster With .

SS.org Regular
Joined
Oct 14, 2020
Messages
94
Reaction score
81
I don't have any headless guitars, but I've always assumed they would have significantly less neck dive? I kinda wish I'd have gone headless on my 8 sitting, cause it dives like crazy.
 

profwoot

SS.org Regular
Joined
Aug 30, 2020
Messages
627
Reaction score
741
I don't have any headless guitars, but I've always assumed they would have significantly less neck dive? I kinda wish I'd have gone headless on my 8 sitting, cause it dives like crazy.
I've got a fixed bridge strandberg that is perfectly balanced and one with a trem that is very slightly body heavy. Neck dive is definitely no issue.
 

HoneyNut

Regular
Joined
Apr 2, 2014
Messages
845
Reaction score
294
So... According to your logic it's ok to consider aesthetics when purchasing a guitar, but not how it actually looks on you when you play it? :scratch:

Don't know about you, but when I buy clothes, I put them on to see if they suit me fine or not.
How it look matters. How it suits the player matters. Id be weird seing Slash with a headless.

But that era of guitar playing over. It's done for. Putting your legs apart like James Hetfield or Slash, just looks dorky in this age. This is what is spinal tap to me now.

The headless guitar to me, fits more like how you see a saxophone player. Its more about the player, and the music, less attention on the guitar. But if the guitar looks good, sure. You either like the Kiesel shape, or Strandberg, or the Hydra whatever. But hanging a guitar low, with long hair and black leather pants or ripped jeans....is over. It just looks gimmicky, and fake today, unless you're already an established band, and you are hetfield, slash or adam jones or that guy from foo fighters whatever.

If you are still hanging your guitar low , you end up looking like a nickelback cover band. Nothing wrong with that though.
 

lurè

Fake Shredder
Joined
Jan 5, 2018
Messages
1,640
Reaction score
2,739
Location
Italy
If you play headless guitars people are expecting a guitar clinic every note you play.
I've got the worst of both worlds: sucking at the instrument and looking horrendous; but at the end I dont give a fuck.
I just have fun with it.
 

tedtan

SS.org Regular
Joined
Dec 2, 2009
Messages
6,035
Reaction score
2,668
Location
Never Neverland
Guitar height isn’t a matter of what is dorky, gimmicky, or “fake”; it’s about the height that allows the player to play properly without putting any extra stress or tension on the player. And that, itself, is a combination of the player’s arm length and technique, not fashion.
 

Emperoff

Not using 5150s
Contributor
Joined
Jul 24, 2005
Messages
7,292
Reaction score
8,726
Location
Spain
How it look matters. How it suits the player matters. Id be weird seing Slash with a headless.

But that era of guitar playing over. It's done for. Putting your legs apart like James Hetfield or Slash, just looks dorky in this age. This is what is spinal tap to me now.

The headless guitar to me, fits more like how you see a saxophone player. Its more about the player, and the music, less attention on the guitar. But if the guitar looks good, sure. You either like the Kiesel shape, or Strandberg, or the Hydra whatever. But hanging a guitar low, with long hair and black leather pants or ripped jeans....is over. It just looks gimmicky, and fake today, unless you're already an established band, and you are hetfield, slash or adam jones or that guy from foo fighters whatever.

If you are still hanging your guitar low , you end up looking like a nickelback cover band. Nothing wrong with that though.

There's more area between a headless guitar at Tom Morello height and James Hetfiled hanging a guitar at knee height, you know? :lol:

It always puzzles me how quick people are to point how wrong you are if you don't like headless guitars hung at chin height. As @tedtan explained, I prefer to hang my guitar where it's comfortable for both arms. As I said, I'm tall. I have long arms, and hanging a guitar high puts unnecessary strain on my shoulders.
 
Last edited:

Neon_Knight_

SS.org Regular
Joined
Nov 26, 2012
Messages
1,274
Reaction score
1,301
Location
England
Also, a properly designed headless will weigh significantly less than most standard guitars. So if you have neck/shoulder troubles it can be a big improvement.
Not significantly less weight than an Ibanez S though...another option worth consideration for anyone with neck / shoulder / back issues.
 

Crundles

SS.org Regular
Joined
May 9, 2016
Messages
264
Reaction score
335
Location
Eastern Europe
I find it adorable how people fear looking dorky with a headless, as if any living soul will ever watch them play

Actual downsides of headless guitars:
- Hardware can be meh
- Hangers and stands
- I don't own enough of them
- I can't play the single one I do own, because I am bad at guitar
 

ArtDecade

Phi Zappa Krappa
Joined
Feb 27, 2009
Messages
7,429
Reaction score
9,740
Location
m7b5
Eddie looked weird playing one and he was the coolest dude to ever walk the earth. What chances do you have?

9e6bedc7d11a81bf7fc9c0006db89ecc--eddie-van-halen-guitar-room.jpg
 

vortex_infinium

SS.org Regular
Joined
May 20, 2009
Messages
1,990
Reaction score
471
Location
Toronto, ON
I’m looking at the Kiesel Vader and the Delos headless model.

A Kiesel with Hipshot(?) hardware is solid stuff.

Where you get difficulty restringing, bad tuning stability, bowed necks, and anything else you can think of, is moreso on cheaper/knockoffs and sketchy companies.
 

Discoqueen

Dang tootin
Joined
Jan 2, 2012
Messages
1,399
Reaction score
201
Location
Buffalo, NY
Hey y’all!

Thanks so much so far for all the feedback!! I’m enjoying the robust and comical replies!

Anyways, to the point that they look bad lol that’s not really helpful anymore, because it’s been said so much. I def get it!! I’m looking for more like technical issues. For instance, I’m realizing I won’t be able to use a snark to tune it.

If anyone cares, I like how they look. If I look like a dork in my apartment and only my boyfriend sees, that point is moot, neither of us care too mich. To expand on that, you know, on stage I’m a vocalist, so I don’t really play out with my guitars, if I did, though, I wouldn’t mind rockin a headless. Someone already trashed the rest of what I wear on stage anyways (leather pants and the like), so I’m already a lost cause as is ^.~ So yeah, the looks aren’t a downside to me, but respect and understand those who don’t like it!!
 

Albake21

Ibanez Nerd
Joined
Jul 19, 2017
Messages
3,422
Reaction score
3,542
Location
Chicago, IL
Hey y’all!

Thanks so much so far for all the feedback!! I’m enjoying the robust and comical replies!

Anyways, to the point that they look bad lol that’s not really helpful anymore, because it’s been said so much. I def get it!! I’m looking for more like technical issues. For instance, I’m realizing I won’t be able to use a snark to tune it.

If anyone cares, I like how they look. If I look like a dork in my apartment and only my boyfriend sees, that point is moot, neither of us care too mich. To expand on that, you know, on stage I’m a vocalist, so I don’t really play out with my guitars, if I did, though, I wouldn’t mind rockin a headless. Someone already trashed the rest of what I wear on stage anyways (leather pants and the like), so I’m already a lost cause as is ^.~ So yeah, the looks aren’t a downside to me, but respect and understand those who don’t like it!!
I think the reason you are only getting responses about how they look is because they don't have any disadvantages. Like others have said, your tech must be awful if they sent it back not wanting to work on it.

Honestly, the only possible thing I can come up with is that I hated the tuning heads on the ones I've owned. They were hard to turn sometimes. Otherwise, there's not disadvantage to having a headless.... other than looks. Which why the jokes write themselves here.
 

littlebadboy

SS.org Regular
Joined
Dec 24, 2014
Messages
1,175
Reaction score
925
Location
Midwestern USA
If you mean to play it in your apartment only, there are also lesser priced alternatives. There is EART on Amazon, Harley Benton Dallahan, GOC with nice pink ones (I see some on Reverb now), and the Ibañez Q series.

I play both headless and with headstock guitars. They are both great! But, I find the headless convenient in my tight space. I have no cons about it so far. But.. I am not a pro guitar player, so who am I to say anything.
 
Top