interesting to see if that's the case.They must have worked something out with Rickenbacker because normally they're on top of handing out cease and desist's to people.
They must have worked something out with Rickenbacker because normally they're on top of handing out cease and desist's to people.
i agree and don't have any loyalty or emotional investment with either brand and there is probably nothing legally actionable but is kind of a slap to RIC. The ric 4000 basses are iconic and immediately identifiable. posted this merely as a conversation piece.I don't think there's anything really actionable, stuff like the pickup cover and bridge have been available aftermarket for years, and I doubt the pickguard is protected.
Besides, I doubt they'd be game to go after FMIC.
This sits right in the space where it's pretty obvious for folks in the know to see the influence, but nothing is close enough of a copy to lead to anything.
That and no one who is shopping for a Ric is going to buy this in consolation.
doesn't quite fit the vibe. but its not so terrible. i agree I'd pass on it unless it has the most perfect neck and sound.I nearly got one before getting my Jazz 5, but that headstock does not go with that body so I passed.