Headrush Prime

Guitarjon

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2007
Messages
1,816
Reaction score
3,223
Location
Hollandtropolis
Hey all,

Headrush FX just released the new Prime pedalboard and they sent me one to demo. It's an interesting unit for sure. I will say straight up that it's not perfect but I'm having a lot of fun with it. I talk about it more in-depth in my review but here are some of the main/new features:

- Amp cloning
- ReValver amps/cabs
- Vocal effects including effects from Antares
- You can process entirely seperate vocal and guitar chains at once
- Nice touch screen hi rez interface

So some of the pros are that the user interface is really nice. Working with this thing is fun! I love how you can load an infinite amount of IRs. The effects are cool and it has some unique features!
Some of the cons are that the amp modeling feels a bit dated (that also counts for the revalver stuff), not all the stock cab/mic options sound good and the amp cloning isn't super accurate. As I said in the video, for high gain stuff it was a bit of a challange for me to find a tone that I liked within a short amount of time. It takes effort. More than with other modelers. That is just my own opinion though and it might be very different from yours.

If you have any questions, I'll be here to talk about it!

 

HeHasTheJazzHands

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2011
Messages
35,270
Reaction score
26,634
Location
Louisiana
From what I can tell Headrush has good effects, easy to use interfaces, etc
...but their amp modeling is just so dated. It's like they did very very flight tweaks to mid 2000s modeling architecture
 

rokket2005

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2007
Messages
1,417
Reaction score
1,196
Location
Minnesota
I saw something that you can load 3rd party VSTs too, which I assume is how they have Autotune built in. If it's done well it will have huge consequences for the rest of the modeling world. They snatched Neural's whole sandwich right out of their hand and ate it right in front of them. The biggest fuck you.
 

HeHasTheJazzHands

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2011
Messages
35,270
Reaction score
26,634
Location
Louisiana
I saw something that you can load 3rd party VSTs too, which I assume is how they have Autotune built in. If it's done well it will have huge consequences for the rest of the modeling world. They snatched Neural's whole sandwich right out of their hand and ate it right in front of them. The biggest fuck you.
I read the manual a bit and I can't find anything about that.

I mean it's got some pretty cool ideas. Having wifi capabilities and linking to Dropbox to be able to transfer IRs, presets, and other misc files is actually pretty cool.
 

BurningRome

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 29, 2015
Messages
491
Reaction score
328
Location
Indianapolis
Headrush MX5 is by far the best User Interface experience I've had vs Helix Stomp, Line 6 GT1000 Core and Fractal FM9.

The touch screen and interface is how the other brands should be doing it.
 

rokket2005

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2007
Messages
1,417
Reaction score
1,196
Location
Minnesota
I read the manual a bit and I can't find anything about that.

I mean it's got some pretty cool ideas. Having wifi capabilities and linking to Dropbox to be able to transfer IRs, presets, and other misc files is actually pretty cool.
Ah, Cordy had a video up before they got officially announced cause Thomann leaked them early or something and apparently there was some sort of VST hosting talk in the leak.
 

HeHasTheJazzHands

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2011
Messages
35,270
Reaction score
26,634
Location
Louisiana
Ah, Cordy had a video up before they got officially announced cause Thomann leaked them early or something and apparently there was some sort of VST hosting talk in the leak.
I just watched the video and yeah, he was going by the fact the plugin Revalver itself can act as a VST host. In the end it's just the Prime using Revalver's amp modeling + amp capturing tech. Maybe it can be added in the future?
 

CTID

Pondering My Orb
Joined
Oct 23, 2011
Messages
1,093
Reaction score
1,031
Location
Bend, OR
Headrush MX5 is by far the best User Interface experience I've had vs Helix Stomp, Line 6 GT1000 Core and Fractal FM9.

The touch screen and interface is how the other brands should be doing it.
agreed, but to me the sound is still more important. i'd take a slightly more difficult interface with my helix with better models, over the interface being better on the headrush, but the modeling being worse imo
 

op1e

Spirit Taker
Joined
Dec 8, 2008
Messages
3,128
Reaction score
627
Location
Northeast Ohio
I think this is new tech and not 11 Rack carried forward like the previous Headrush boards. That's why I stayed away before. Damn 11R came out same time as my gsp1101, I already have outdated amp modeling that I know how to deal with lol.
 

Spinedriver

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 22, 2007
Messages
3,021
Reaction score
815
Location
NB,Canuckistan
I just watched the video and yeah, he was going by the fact the plugin Revalver itself can act as a VST host. In the end it's just the Prime using Revalver's amp modeling + amp capturing tech. Maybe it can be added in the future?
So it has all of the ReValver amps from version 4 ? I seem to recall it being ok but that was years ago and something tells me all of the 'deep editing' ReValver had won't be in the Headrush (ie: changing the plate voltages of the pre/power tubes, bias, etc...).
 

shredmonster76

SS.org Regular
Joined
Dec 27, 2020
Messages
18
Reaction score
13
I had the original headrush pedal board, and while it was really cool and easy to use interface wise, it just didn't sound great to me. I used it in 4 cable with my evh stealth as the tone because i didn't care for the amp models. i sold it after a year and got an fm3. straight out of the box the fm3 sounded fantastic, I made some edited presets of the petrucci rig and and thats it, im done. I don't even use the tone from the stealth anymore, its just a power amp these days. i typically don't like to mess with settings much, but the interface on the fractal was easy enough that i could dial in my tones easy enough. i care much more about how it sounds versus how easy it is to navigate the interface. also, from my experience, fractal is much more active about updating their products and adding features.
 

cindarkness

SS.org Regular
Joined
Sep 7, 2021
Messages
225
Reaction score
285
Location
EU
So it's 2x the price and 4x the size of my current MX5 🤔

I might consider selling the MX5 and getting this but I'm definitely going to hold onto it for now. I do like the bigger touchscreen, more pleasant looking UI and the addition of Revalver amps - if they're anything good of course..

The vocal stuff and capture tech isn't my thing. I do see myself capturing some of my II II II II tones though.
The big boooooo from me is the lack of a PC editor of course, what the heck Headrush? Just make it happen.. But it's 2023 and even the Quad Cortex still doesn't have one.
 

Spinedriver

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 22, 2007
Messages
3,021
Reaction score
815
Location
NB,Canuckistan
So it's 2x the price and 4x the size of my current MX5 🤔

I might consider selling the MX5 and getting this but I'm definitely going to hold onto it for now. I do like the bigger touchscreen, more pleasant looking UI and the addition of Revalver amps - if they're anything good of course..

The vocal stuff and capture tech isn't my thing. I do see myself capturing some of my II II II II tones though.
The big boooooo from me is the lack of a PC editor of course, what the heck Headrush? Just make it happen.. But it's 2023 and even the Quad Cortex still doesn't have one.
The Cortex doesn't have any kind of editiing software ? From the company that primarily sells VSTs !??!
That just doesn't make any sense.
 
Top