Face tattoos??

Discussion in 'Off-Topic' started by facepalm66, Feb 21, 2013.

  1. PyramidSmasher

    PyramidSmasher Chess Dragon

    Messages:
    1,571
    Likes Received:
    254
    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2010
    Location:
    Cleveland, OH
    While the cool/nice face tattoo DOES exist, it is the hardest place to put something without looking like a serial killer
     
  2. abandonist

    abandonist Banned

    Messages:
    2,402
    Likes Received:
    282
    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2012
    Location:
    Greenville, SC
    I'm covered in tattoos - arms, chest, back, knuckles, and I have a moon tattooed at the point where my sideburn meets my hairline. It's small and usually covered by my hair, but it's there.

    I think "face" tattoos usually just aren't attractive, but I don't really care if anyone gets one.
     
  3. skeels

    skeels ..to pay the beels

    Messages:
    4,134
    Likes Received:
    724
    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2009
    Location:
    milwaukee,WI
    Personally I like the serial killer look...

    I also dig that snake tongue thing....
     
  4. Watty

    Watty Naturally Cynical

    Messages:
    3,811
    Likes Received:
    386
    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2009
    Location:
    Renton, Washington
    Well, I think by definition, an opinion can't be completely objective, so I'd have to agree to that extent. :lol:

    I don't have anything against him inherently as he could be the nicest guy in the world; what I don't care for is his means of revealing the fact that he wants attention.

    I'm most definitely NOT advocating for respecting the pursuits of happiness in all arenas, sorry if that was not clear.

    I understand his thought process just fine; he wanted to be viewed a certain way by others, and he made that a reality. And I think his tattoos are interesting not to mention well done, something most people don't seem to care about. And I'll say again that I don't consider his decision to be something worthy of my respect.

    This makes things slightly more difficult for me, as you'd probably hoped, but only because one could involve so many things that are not self-destructive the individual being considered. And, while I know this doesn't answer the question, but how do you feel about the guy that supposedly had a pair of glasses tattooed onto his face? Is it a situation that falls into the same category as what Rick's done, or do you feel that the type of work done on the face changes what sort of respect is deserved? Is one stupid and the other art? Did one require significantly more "balls" than the other to go through with it? I'd be interested to hear your thoughts on this juxtaposition of ink.

    I typed out a longer reply to this but realized it was a bit moot given that we've already disagreed on the point that would allow you to see exactly where I'm coming from. In short, yes...to the first part of this sentiment. And I'm not "disliking" Rick because of assumptions and ignorance, I'm disliking him because he made what I deem to be a stupid decision in his pursuit of external gratification for it (cyclical I know, but I believe someone mentioned that his work was done over time, so I figure it applies).
     
  5. Watty

    Watty Naturally Cynical

    Messages:
    3,811
    Likes Received:
    386
    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2009
    Location:
    Renton, Washington
    Let's say you pass someone on the street who's covered in ink. Being that you have tattoos as well, your first thought is probably wondering one of the following:

    1) Who did the work.
    2) What might have been his reasoning for getting them.
    3) How long he's had them.
    4) Whether he covers them up when working.
    5) Etc.

    For the person who doesn't have tattoos, or doesn't care for them, the list might look like:

    1) What a waste of money.
    2) How stupid does this guy look?
    3) I wonder who the heck would hire him.
    4) Does he regret getting them?
    5) Etc.

    Perhaps you never even speak to the guy in question, but you've elected to think on questions significantly different than those of the "outsider;" and, in this regard, I think that you've elected to give him some respect inherently. This is, again, an oversimplification, but you've essentially chosen to bypass those "disrespectful" questions for a reason; I maintain it's due to what your post replied to.
     
  6. s_k_mullins

    s_k_mullins [email protected]#$?!

    Messages:
    3,836
    Likes Received:
    774
    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2008
    Location:
    MS, USA
  7. skeels

    skeels ..to pay the beels

    Messages:
    4,134
    Likes Received:
    724
    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2009
    Location:
    milwaukee,WI
    This thread has kind of made me want to get a tattoo on my face.
     
  8. The Reverend

    The Reverend GHETTO KING OF SWAG

    Messages:
    3,457
    Likes Received:
    431
    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2010
    Location:
    Arlington, TX
    The first sentence I take issue with. He has visible tattoos (as opposed to invisible tattoos :lol:), but that doesn't necessarily mean he got them just for the attention. We can never know for sure, since even his word has to be taken with some skepticism. I'll give you that point since there's no way to prove or disprove it without being in Rick's head.


    Self-destructive, for the time being, can't be used in our situation, as Rick either parlayed his choices into a career, or created a career by getting the work done he did. As for your question, humorously enough, one did require more balls than the other in terms of pain. I'm hesitant to get into a discussion of what can be considered art, as older and wiser heads disagree vehemently and much more eloquently than I on that matter.

    IMO, both command my respect. Whatever the reasons each had behind their choices, they live with the consequences. I'd afford the same respect to them that I would a gay couple holding hands, walking down Main Street in Smalltown, Texas. Of course, that assumes that Rick and Glasses Guy got their work to make their body more appealing to their idea of beauty. I'd even respect them if they just did it for attention, because they were willing to satisfy their needs in a much bolder way than I.

    I guess I'm just more willing to take an empathetic stance than one based on solely my own standards.
     
  9. Watty

    Watty Naturally Cynical

    Messages:
    3,811
    Likes Received:
    386
    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2009
    Location:
    Renton, Washington
    Well said, though I'll refrain from holding as comparable a stance.
     
  10. Kiwimetal101

    Kiwimetal101 'Tread Lightly'

    Messages:
    750
    Likes Received:
    58
    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2011
    Location:
    Hamilton, New Zealand
    Its just fucked up

    I'm all for being yourself and doing your own thing, but the way society is these days with appearance and everything else people should really fucking know better. I'm studying to become a primary school teacher (elementary) and I need to be really careful from now on about how I act, dress, speak, load stuff on FB etc which is really annoying. But its the world we live in and I need a career at some point.
     
  11. ILuvPillows

    ILuvPillows Baby seal will destr

    Messages:
    465
    Likes Received:
    30
    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2010
    Location:
    Bath, England
    ^Different worlds, my friend. Different worlds.
     
  12. skeels

    skeels ..to pay the beels

    Messages:
    4,134
    Likes Received:
    724
    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2009
    Location:
    milwaukee,WI
    ^We all get a choice. Some of us choose to do things regardless of societal expectations. Some of us choose to conform to opinions and judgements that "the world" tells us we should have.

    Hurray for choice!
     
  13. The Reverend

    The Reverend GHETTO KING OF SWAG

    Messages:
    3,457
    Likes Received:
    431
    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2010
    Location:
    Arlington, TX
    You know, one could almost make this a philosophical debate. Should one have to sacrifice personal happiness in order to fit in with society's arbitrary norms? And which is more venerable, the man who lives life for himself, or lives life to please others?

    I'm reminded of the ancient Greek's penchant for pedophilia. At that time, it wasn't a traumatizing thing, and viewed as completely normal. Young boys would actually vie for the attention of older masters to bring themselves and their families some renown. In today's world, that's a disgusting ideology. Which is truly normal? Which is better? Is one really better than the other?
     
  14. Blake1970

    Blake1970 SS.org Regular

    Messages:
    1,870
    Likes Received:
    250
    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2010
    Location:
    Humble, TX
    :hbang:
     

    Attached Files:

  15. ILuvPillows

    ILuvPillows Baby seal will destr

    Messages:
    465
    Likes Received:
    30
    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2010
    Location:
    Bath, England
    ^Haha my local tattoo shop has that exact same print out.
     
  16. axxessdenied

    axxessdenied Arium Addict

    Messages:
    3,605
    Likes Received:
    949
    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2011
    Location:
    Ontario, Canada
    I don't see anything "artistic" about this chick getting her face tattoo'd like this.

    Let's see... she pretty much let her boyfriend BRAND HER FACE like she's a piece of property. Sooooo artistic. More, like fucking retarded!

    I don't mind tattoo's but this just looks like stupidity to the max. :2c:
     
  17. DanakinSkywalker

    DanakinSkywalker SS.org Regular

    Messages:
    430
    Likes Received:
    79
    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2012
    Location:
    Idaho
    OP is very dumb, like axxess said. That's not even an artistic tattoo, just some guys name on a chick's face. Very stupid. I guess face tattoos are cool if you never want a decent paying job.
     
  18. død

    død SS.org Regular

    Messages:
    344
    Likes Received:
    148
    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2008
    Location:
    Oslo
    Please don't try making a definition of what "art" and "artistic" means. While I agree the tattoo is fucking ugly as shit, the artist made it with his artistic abilities, and it is with out a doubt a piece of art. Art doesn't have to be beatiful.
     
  19. axxessdenied

    axxessdenied Arium Addict

    Messages:
    3,605
    Likes Received:
    949
    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2011
    Location:
    Ontario, Canada
    Why not?? Too many people try to pass off bullshit as "art". Don't want to get your feelings hurt, don't make your work public. :2c:
    Some people are just not cut out to be "artists".

    It's like people that get a DSLR and automatically label themselves "photographers".

    Our society is way too politically correct, people need to hear the truth once in a while and get a reality check!
     
  20. død

    død SS.org Regular

    Messages:
    344
    Likes Received:
    148
    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2008
    Location:
    Oslo
    Because you not liking something doesn't take away the fact that it's art. Art's number one purpose is to get a reaction out of people. This certainly got a reaction, and therefore it is art. Even horrible, shitty art is still art. You can tell that to the person that created it. Doesn't change a thing.
     

Share This Page