EQ Overkill???

Discussion in 'Extended Range Guitars' started by crg123, Dec 12, 2012.

  1. crg123

    crg123 SS.orgLocalArchitect

    Messages:
    2,919
    Likes Received:
    373
    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2011
    Location:
    Boston, MA
    Ok somewhat of a silly question,

    I was thinking about buying a 32-band EQ for my 8 string with Lace Death bar/Xbar combo in it. What I love about these pickups are they have an extremely large tonal range that can be used to mold a lot of interesting tones, but without the EQ they sound extremely flat though. I figure since I'm tuning down to D#1 (around 39 hz I think?) a standard GE-7 (I have two of them >.<) which only has 6 bands (100,200,400,800,1.6k,3.2k,6.4k) isn't really the ideal EQ choice. I thought it might be interesting to have control over all those inbetween frequencies and the lower register.

    Would having a 20hz-20khz 32 band EQ be too much for just a guitar? Anyone have any experience with this?

    Any help is appreciated!

    Edit:
    This might be better suited for the gear section but I figured I might receive some better opinions from the ERG section (plus its basically my second home :lol:)

    Edit 2: Anyway to remove 2 of those "?" marks I feel like a noob...
     
  2. Winspear

    Winspear Tom Winspear

    Messages:
    11,606
    Likes Received:
    2,294
    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2009
    Location:
    Yorkshire, U.K
    It would be easy to overdo things with a 32 band. They are really nice for ringing out a PA system for feedback at specific frequencies, but honestly it would be overkill and you are likely to run into phase issues or be easily pushed into overdoing things.

    I would shoot for a 10 band graphic, or even better, two parametrics with sweepable bands and fine tuning of the bandwidth.

    To be honest though I think you should be able to do everything with two GE-7s like you have. You don't really need to play around in the low end so much and the bandwidths are likely pretty wide anyway.
     
  3. Bloodbath Salt

    Bloodbath Salt Title-less

    Messages:
    163
    Likes Received:
    3
    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2012
    Location:
    Rehab
    You could try using a EQ that's designed for bass, since those will be the frequencies you'll be taking up. IMO, 8 stringers should be looking at bass equipment, instead of standard guitar equipment.
     
  4. crg123

    crg123 SS.orgLocalArchitect

    Messages:
    2,919
    Likes Received:
    373
    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2011
    Location:
    Boston, MA
    Is the MXR 10 band any good? I acutally never looked at the frequency range on that. I think I remembering hearing that its pretty noisy (not that it matters cause I have two noise gates w/ my keeley compressor +Maxon 808 (DONT JUDGE ME lol). Should I keep one GE-7 and buy the MXR? right now I have a pre and a post EQ.

    A parametric EQ would be amazing but i don't know where to even start with those (like whats good/ bad about a particular model) Any recommendations, keep in mind I'm supposed to be on a budget haha.
     
  5. WaffleTheEpic

    WaffleTheEpic Banned

    Messages:
    1,473
    Likes Received:
    129
    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2012
    Location:
    Paragould, Arkansas
    Look up youtube reviews for it. I'd say maybe try a bass EQ in conjunction with one of the normal range EQs you have, but I'm not sure that'd work out too well, honestly. I dunno, you could try it. Otherwise, that seems like too much.
     
  6. Bloodbath Salt

    Bloodbath Salt Title-less

    Messages:
    163
    Likes Received:
    3
    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2012
    Location:
    Rehab
    If you try that. I'd put the guitar EQ > bass EQ and use a noise gate/suppressor in conjunction with the 2. Although a parametric EQ is still probably your best bet.
     
  7. Given To Fly

    Given To Fly SS.org Regular

    Messages:
    4,064
    Likes Received:
    263
    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2004
    Location:
    Denver, Colorado
    All of the Eleven Rack presets which work well with an 8 string use 2 parametric EQ's in the signal chain. I realize the Eleven Rack is software and you are looking at hardware, but the point is 2 parametric EQ's can be extremely powerful when shaping your tone.
     
  8. UV7BK4LIFE

    UV7BK4LIFE Schecter A7 addict

    Messages:
    1,755
    Likes Received:
    299
    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2012
    Location:
    Rotterdam area, The Netherlands
    I made a preset with 6 x 2 band parametric EQ on my Zoom Multistomp. 12 band parametric is overkill, 4 band will do.

    With a graphic eq, I'd buy a 32 band without hesitation. You don't have to use all the sliders but when you need any frequency it will be at your disposal.
     
  9. nightflameauto

    nightflameauto SS.org Regular

    Messages:
    118
    Likes Received:
    27
    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2010
    Location:
    Sioux Falls, SD
    I don't know why people are talking you down from using a 32 band EQ. If I had the money I'd probably grab a couple of them, one pre, one post for my rig. A 32 band gives you more shaping options. And yes, it would be easy to overdo something and give yourself a really odd sound with missing or over-emphasized frequencies in narrow ranges, but that's a matter of self control and not an equipment failing.

    That said, I do use parametric EQs in my recording software on 8 string tracks to filter out just specific frequencies. They offer some very fine-grained control when you need just *THAT* frequency range changed.
     
  10. crg123

    crg123 SS.orgLocalArchitect

    Messages:
    2,919
    Likes Received:
    373
    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2011
    Location:
    Boston, MA
    So i just thought of something. If I buy the MXR 10 band that would be interesting because none of the frequency controls are the same.

    MXR: 31.25, 62.5,125,250,500,1k,2k,4k,8k,16k
    Ge-7: 100, 200, 400, 800, 1.6k, 3.2k, 6.4k

    That would mean with both of them together I would pretty much have a 17 band eq haha. I think I'll go for it especially because of the 31.25 and 62.5 (#'s seem random though) which should help me mess with the low end clarity of the low D#.
     
  11. RGA8

    RGA8 SS.org Regular

    Messages:
    232
    Likes Received:
    87
    Joined:
    May 22, 2010
    Location:
    USA
    I bought a MXR M108 two days ago and it's very handy. I think they did a good job choosing the frequencies for that pedal. You should try one out.
     
  12. oniduder

    oniduder HONKEY DONKEY

    Messages:
    2,414
    Likes Received:
    504
    Joined:
    May 9, 2010
    Location:
    the metro, sc
    i've had this discussion before with a friend of mine, long story short, you should be able to get away with a tone knob and a volume knob on your amp and whatever shit you have on your guitar

    this is of course coming from a douche who owns three fucking amps that are all designed to do wacko shit and obviously have more than a tone knob blablabla, but yeah overkill with the 32 band eq shite, very unnecessary

    now it's someone's turn to tell me i'm wrong and stupid, :lol:

    but yeah i thought about getting shit like this for my shit, and i keep ending up selling every eq i ever buy, i actually go crazy, just a lil bit don't worry, with them all the endless possibilities and will end up sitting for hours for that "perfect" tone, then i realize it's all shit :wallbash:
     
  13. gs_waldemar

    gs_waldemar SS.org Regular

    Messages:
    54
    Likes Received:
    1
    Joined:
    May 26, 2010
    Location:
    GER
    I agree on bass eq. The 32-graphical eq will either make your sound spikey, or you will use it in a way that you form "waves" with the single faders. Which would mean that you could just as well have an eq with only 5 faders.

    I personally do not use extra EQ, because you can get the same effect from a different ratio of gain and amp eq. Actually, by changing the ratio of gain/eq on amp wisely you can get a lot of sounds.
     
  14. Winspear

    Winspear Tom Winspear

    Messages:
    11,606
    Likes Received:
    2,294
    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2009
    Location:
    Yorkshire, U.K
    Worded it much better. This is exactly what I was trying to say :lol:
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.