Search results

Nope, never showed up. I recently bought a B6 which I like a lot, but I do miss this a great deal. I thought whoever took it was bound to google it and be unable to resist the temptation to try and sell eventually but nothing I've ever come across in the years since.

Thanks all. Unfortunately I don't have Facebook but a loads of friends and bands have been sharing it. Appreciate it.

Apologies if this isn't in the right place. I'm hurriedly posting round various forums. My Blackmachine B2 was stolen from my Glasgow flat yesterday (along with a beat up 1974 ivory P-Bass). To my knowledge, it's the only B2 with an ebony top and Hannes bridge - it was the last guitar Doug...

BELGIAN sludge kings AMENRA have promised their "most memorable" UK show in 13 years as they head to Damnation Festival to headline the Eyesore Stage. They'll join English post-rockers MAYBESHEWILL and purveyors of doom Witchsorrow at Leeds University Union, on Saturday, November 3, 2012, for...

Quite possibly. Though your original question, to which I gave a bunch of laws I'd have, was about what sensible gun control would be, not about how to transform the US gun crime situation in 6 months. It's always going to be a decades long process. It's too out of hand for anything else.

The relationship with guns and the crime associated with them in the US if FUCKED. Nobody's trying to suggest something that's going to fix it. Only things that might help aid it's reduction over a long time. Very expensive bullets would help do that. You'd obviously control boxes of ammunition...

That's not slander, legally anyway. He's not accusing her of a specific act. Just of generally having loose morals. Some people would consider any female who's had sex with more than one man, any man outwith marriage and so on to be a slut. You'd need to actually legally define the term :lol...

That would be part and parcel of my above outline. And ammunition would be expensive.

Well weapons changing hands would certainly be illegal in my above situation. You could trade them in to licensed gun stores, obviously, or sell them to them. But nothing between people and no gifting them. And any sales other than that would result in the removal of a license from both parties...

Has he? I'm quite surprised he gets away with it in The Land Of Litigation.

Where do all the illegal guns come from currently?

Bearing in mind I'm not familiar with the intricacies of what is currently the legal status of gun ownership in whatever states, so some of these things may already be the case. Well, I'd basically have zero handguns outwith shooting clubs - no home ownership whatsoever. All firearm...

I'm not sure this is true. I've a friend currently working on their PhD thesis on the topic. Admittedly they work out of a military academy with the top forensics unit in the UK, so maybe it's just that it's very rare to be able to do so with Police resources.

Definitely, but that's the whole point, isn't it? That's why Fox News can get away with stating absolute nonsense. So long as you don't attribute it to specific people or organisations it's legal - precisely because it's freedom of speech. And I think that's acceptable enough, if irritating...

The people who go out to do mass killings, yes. No one sensible is going to suggest otherwise. But with far fewer guns you vastly reduce the instances of attempted robberies, street fights, hell even arguments in bars that turn into gun crimes and firearms murders.

Examples? I mentioned earlier the only exceptions I think should exist. Incitement to violence and theats. I believe I've been entirely consistent.

Ah, ok. Though I think the prose somewhat suggests they're the same thing.

Slander and libel are very specific and don't really relate to free speech. Free speech is about being able to voice any opinion or interpretation, not about making false factual claims about people or businesses. Can you reword that, please?

I'm not disputing that certain laws exist, I'm saying in most cases they shouldn't. Slander and libel are different situations.

I don't think that's a remotely valid comparison. Disliking what your tax money is being spent on is rather different than being so distrustful of your government you feel you need to be armed to be safe.