Tuning 25.5" scale guitar to G or F#

Discussion in 'Sevenstring Guitars' started by Shredguitar666, Jul 24, 2011.

  1. Shredguitar666

    Shredguitar666 SS.org Regular

    Messages:
    69
    Likes Received:
    30
    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2010
    Location:
    Aalborg, Denmark
    Is it a must to have a 7 string guitar with an extended neck (e.g. 26.5" or 27") before it makes sense to tune down to e.g. G or F#? Is it enough to simply put on a thicker set of strings and then have a normal scale 7 string, or will this always sound muddy and sloppy? Or at least muddier and sloppier than a guitar with an extended neck...
     
  2. Valserp

    Valserp Only plays 1 string

    Messages:
    739
    Likes Received:
    197
    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2008
    Location:
    Bulgaria
    It WILL get muddier, compared to an extended scale, but that doesn't mean it's not doable. Get a pickup that clears off most of the mud(BKP PainKiller? EMG 81-7x?) and you'll be fine.
     
  3. Shredguitar666

    Shredguitar666 SS.org Regular

    Messages:
    69
    Likes Received:
    30
    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2010
    Location:
    Aalborg, Denmark
    The guitar I am gonna buy is going to get a DiMarzio LiquiFire in neck position and DiMarzio D-Activator in bridge position - I already decided that :)

    So I should be good to go if I get these awesome pickups and some appropriately thick strings?
     
  4. Shredguitar666

    Shredguitar666 SS.org Regular

    Messages:
    69
    Likes Received:
    30
    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2010
    Location:
    Aalborg, Denmark
    ..or in fact maybe a DiMarzio Crunchlab in bridge position..
     
  5. thebass444

    thebass444 SS.org Regular

    Messages:
    45
    Likes Received:
    37
    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2011
    Location:
    United States
    I think you might've gotten that backwards ha. I'm pretty sure the liquifire would be in the neck, and the d-activator in the bridge. I've heard the d-activators are pretty tight, but I haven't had any experience with them. I'm sure someone who has will chime in
     
  6. Shredguitar666

    Shredguitar666 SS.org Regular

    Messages:
    69
    Likes Received:
    30
    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2010
    Location:
    Aalborg, Denmark
    Yes sorry :) I corrected my replies already.. I mis-typed :D
     
  7. powergroover

    powergroover monster death chunk

    Messages:
    546
    Likes Received:
    85
    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2008
    Location:
    Indonesia
    i tune my 24.75" guitar to G# :lol:
    the guitar has emg 81 on it and i don't have any complaint regarding muddiness :hbang: at least for me though
     
  8. Kamikaze7

    Kamikaze7 Banned

    Messages:
    1,209
    Likes Received:
    126
    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2009
    Location:
    Parts Unknown, NJ
    Out of my 5 7-strings, each one is tuned a half step different from the next by a half step. All of them are 25 1/2" scale and I don't have an issue with being muddy. One is tuned to C# w/ a low G# using Ernie Ball Beefy Slinky strings with a 64 for the G#. The next one is tuned to C w/ a low G and that one uses the Regular Slinky strings minus the 10 guage and adding a 66 for the low G. In addition, my 8-string is also a 25 1/2" scale, and I use the Regular Slinky's on that also, but use a 70 for the F#. I'm considering moving up to a 72 possibly soon as it is a little loose, but it's not loose enough to be floppy or not hold tuning stability.

    So as long as you find the right guage set that's a happy meduim and you tweak you EQ's the right way, you can get what you want from a standard and even a short scale.
     
  9. Shredguitar666

    Shredguitar666 SS.org Regular

    Messages:
    69
    Likes Received:
    30
    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2010
    Location:
    Aalborg, Denmark
    Okay thanks a lot for the very good answers :) I will continue on my hunt for the next guitar!
     
  10. Barney

    Barney SS.org Regular

    Messages:
    142
    Likes Received:
    4
    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2010
    Location:
    BP
    IMO the lowest you can tune a regular 25.5 guitar is Bb, maybe A.
    You have to put on quite thick strings to compensate the short string length and it will start to stiffen up. They do not resonate good enough and the harmonics will go off... It won't intonate properly.
    I tuned a 27 scale guitar to G with a 0.74 string and it was okayish... Ab would have been better with a lighter string, maybe 72 or 68.
     
  11. vampiregenocide

    vampiregenocide A Chap Called Ross

    Messages:
    16,166
    Likes Received:
    2,100
    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2008
    Location:
    Hertfordshire, England
    It's subjective, but personally I don't like using heavier strings as they start feeling odd and not sounding nice to me. So I generally prefer extended scale lengths for tuning down. You can certainly do it, but when getting really heavy string gauges for F/F# tuning etc they tend to sound pretty nasty. There is a reason most people tend to go for baritones for F tuning etc.

    It is down to what you prefer feel wise. If you tend to go for thinner strings and a more snappy tone, then get a baritone. If you don't mind hench strings then get a standard scale.
     
  12. Bigfan

    Bigfan sixstringer

    Messages:
    1,702
    Likes Received:
    251
    Joined:
    May 1, 2010
    Location:
    Karm√ły, Norway
    Bulb uses a lot of 25.5" scale guitars in drop G#, doesn't he? Anything he does is apparently gospel around here.
     
  13. Dayn

    Dayn silly person

    Messages:
    1,268
    Likes Received:
    90
    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2011
    Location:
    Brisbane, Australia
    For me... I feel it is. I have my six 25.5" in G#, and compared to my eight 27" down in E... the .080 E sounds far better than the .066 G#. That's an EMG808 compared to an EMG85X. I just feel, even clean, that the G# was just too 'thick' for its own good; both sound-wise and playing-wise. I could get a good tone out of it... but it just didn't sit right with me.

    I guess what I'm trying to say is... go for it! Give it a shot, you may like it. Or you may not. But you won't know until you try.
     
  14. bostjan

    bostjan MicroMetal Contributor

    Messages:
    12,966
    Likes Received:
    1,137
    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2005
    Location:
    St. Johnsbury, VT USA
    25.5" guitars are ubiquitous, so go ahead and give it a try.

    The thinner the string or the longer the scale, the lesser the measure of string inharmonicity due to tension. It doesn't really have anything to do with the pickups, the string will eventually just sound shitty if it's too thick and too short. Each person has their own limit, but for me, it's around G on a 25.5" scale. Going to 27" helps this two-fold. 1) The string is longer, and 2) You can get away with a slightly thinner string. So at 27", you can tune down to F# and even F with it sounding better than 25.5" at G.
     
  15. K3V1N SHR3DZ

    K3V1N SHR3DZ EMPERORoftheUNIVERSE

    Messages:
    523
    Likes Received:
    76
    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2006
    Location:
    missouri
    I CANNOT play a 27" scale due to my little girl hands.
    I have my 7321 tuned (low to high) F#BEADGB with (high to low) 11, 16, 24, 32, 42, 52, 60.
    It has stock pups. I don't pick super hard, and cut a lot of bass (that's not my job anyway).

    I think it Sounds GREAT.
     
  16. etb1234

    etb1234 SS.org Regular

    Messages:
    88
    Likes Received:
    31
    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2010
    Location:
    London, ON
    I tune my 1527 to G with 59 and 46-10 on the rest. Ive set it well and it plays and sounds just as good as my 27 inch scale tuned to the same, with the same set of strings. Different strokes, different setups.
     
  17. Greatoliver

    Greatoliver Looking to windward

    Messages:
    895
    Likes Received:
    56
    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2009
    Location:
    Cambridge/Suffolk, UK
    How do you lot all use such floppy strings on the bottom? I use 10-46 in E standard, so when in drop A, I use a 70 to match the tension... I tried a 68 and it was just too floppy :ugh:

    A 59 at G is 10 pounds of tension! :ugh:








    :ugh:
     
  18. EdgeCrusher

    EdgeCrusher SS.org Regular

    Messages:
    893
    Likes Received:
    102
    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2005
    Location:
    Dahlonega, Ga
    I was bored the other day and tried tuning my bottom string retarded low to a weird tuning I thought up; DDADGBE. I use a 59, so it was super floppy, practically unuseable; I did make a clip with it though. Used my RG7 w/ D-Sonic into a V-amp Pro boosted w/ a TS808.

    http://www.netmusicians.org/files/94-SubOctaveDriff.mp3

    IMO it would be perfectly useable at F# with a slightly larger string, around a 65-70 would be good.
     
  19. Darkstar124

    Darkstar124 Strongman

    Messages:
    412
    Likes Received:
    46
    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2010
    Location:
    Chicago, IL
    I've got my RG7420 in F standard right now(25.5" scale), with a 75 on the low B and a 60 on the low E. It's definitely a great deal floppier than my buddy's schecter damien seven diamond series 26.5" even though he has a 65 on there in the same tuning. Unless you have some telephone lines to spare I wouldn't deal with it. It sure is fun though. heh.

    Tl;dr unless you have huge strings dont even bother, but it is totally doable.
     
  20. CrownofWorms

    CrownofWorms SS.org Regular

    Messages:
    1,433
    Likes Received:
    222
    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2010
    Location:
    Chicago, Ill, United States
    I tune to F# on a 25.5 scale length. its not muddy at all, but I am using .70 gauges.
     

Share This Page