Dear Texas: Sit down, we need to have a chat

Discussion in 'Politics & Current Events' started by pink freud, Jun 27, 2012.

  1. pink freud

    pink freud SS.org Regular

    Messages:
    4,108
    Likes Received:
    496
    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2009
  2. highlordmugfug

    highlordmugfug themuthaphukkindeath

    Messages:
    4,659
    Likes Received:
    469
    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2009


    Weak minds, strong backs, just smart enough to do what you tell them: Just the way that Texas likes em.
     
  3. canuck brian

    canuck brian Bowes Guitars

    Messages:
    3,561
    Likes Received:
    717
    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2006
    Normally I would just say I'm not surprised, but there was a couple of things in there that I was actually pretty surprised to see.

    Internet Access - We support a free and open internet -- free from intrusion, censorship, or control by government or private entities. Due to the inherent benefit of anonymity, the anonymity of users is not to be compromised for any reason, unless consented by the user; or by court order. We also oppose any mandates by the government to collect and retain records of our internet activity.

    I find the one about not teaching any forms of sexual education aside from abstinence to anyone until marriage to be ridiculous. Pretty sure that hormonal teenagers are going to poke. After reading thru all of it, it kinda looks like the RPoT wants to bring 'Murica back to the 50's. The lines about recinding no-fault divorce are pretty gold.
     
  4. Blind Theory

    Blind Theory SS.org Regular

    Messages:
    938
    Likes Received:
    120
    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2011
    I read the education part of it. Pretty awesome shit if you're crazy, I suppose. They don't want to approve of critical thinking education because they think it will undermine any religious or moral beliefs set in place by parents.

    Then they want to teach intelligent design in the science classroom as a legitimate scientific theory and try to hide it by saying "We believe theories such as life origins and environmental change should be taught as challengeable scientific theories subject to change as new data is produced. Teachers and students should be able to discuss the strengths and weaknesses of these theories openly and without fear of retribution or discrimination of any kind."

    At this point I don't really care what they believe. Trying to pass off a religious idea as scientific theory and then making it seem like they are the good guys who are compromising by teaching this stuff is sickening. Texas is one of the most conservative states out there and if anyone reverts back to the cave I bet it'll be them. And if not them, they won't be far behind.
     
  5. MFB

    MFB ExBendable

    Messages:
    11,602
    Likes Received:
    926
    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2008
    PROS :
    CONS:
     
  6. ElRay

    ElRay Mostly Harmless

    Messages:
    3,123
    Likes Received:
    390
    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2006
    {Original post snipped because I fired-off something quickly, and as much as quote-mining "critical thinking" is wrong, there's so much wrong is that whole document nit-picking that one point is pointless.}

    Ray
     
  7. Necris

    Necris Bonitis.

    Messages:
    4,186
    Likes Received:
    409
    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2009
    Support of the government affirming religious values? Read the First Amendment a few more times.

    The existence of abortion clinics in no way pressures women to have abortions, there are no protocols in place in any state that give Doctors or healthcare providers the right to pressure a woman into an unwanted abortion.

    They already are liable in cases of malpractice and are held to the the same standards as other medical facilities. Find me one that isn't if you're going to assert that they aren't.

    Disturbing.

    So that is the extent of language education you support? Teaching English to non-english speakers but not teaching a foreign language to English speakers?

    This is a sneaky way of positioning themselves to legally teach creationism in schools. If you are going to teach outright non-scientific ideas in science class you're defeating the purpose of the class. Not to mention no-one has ever been discriminated against for not believing in something like evolution unless you want to redefine discrimination to include the mere act of questioning the basis for someones belief.
     
  8. Blind Theory

    Blind Theory SS.org Regular

    Messages:
    938
    Likes Received:
    120
    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2011
    You listed your first pro as "Controversial Theories – We support objective teaching and equal treatment of all sides of scientific theories. We believe theories such as life origins and environmental change should be taught as challengeable scientific theories subject to change as new data is produced. Teachers and students should be able to discuss the strengths and weaknesses of these theories openly and without fear of retribution or discrimination of any kind."

    How, if I may ask, is that a positive thing? Trying to sneak non-science based religious theory into a classroom is not a positive thing. If you want to teach these things, offer a religious studies elective but don't try and force it into the core curriculum. Neil deGrasse Tyson hit the nail on the head when he said there was no tradition of scientists knocking down the doors of Sunday schools to tell them what to teach.
     
  9. pink freud

    pink freud SS.org Regular

    Messages:
    4,108
    Likes Received:
    496
    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2009
    I'm guessing he just didn't recognize the code-words. If taken literally that is what should happen (and is actually what science is all about). But we all know better.

    Another thing that bugs me, and has for years, is the fucking flag worship. Saying the Pledge of Allegiance doesn't teach anything. Pure lip-service.
     
  10. MFB

    MFB ExBendable

    Messages:
    11,602
    Likes Received:
    926
    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2008
    What pink said is true, I mis-interpretted that as teaching evolution and ALL theories vs. just creationism which is what it really means. I should've thought about it given it being from Texas and all but I was blinded by hope that they might, just MIGHT be changing their ways.
     
    Blind Theory likes this.
  11. Sicarius

    Sicarius Reggie J Worthington

    Messages:
    3,020
    Likes Received:
    123
    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2010
  12. MFB

    MFB ExBendable

    Messages:
    11,602
    Likes Received:
    926
    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2008
    That's the larger picture here ;)
     
  13. TemjinStrife

    TemjinStrife Power Metal Cellist

    Messages:
    5,101
    Likes Received:
    467
    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2007
    Modern far-right conservatism:

    Equal parts hilarious and terrifying.
     
  14. Sicarius

    Sicarius Reggie J Worthington

    Messages:
    3,020
    Likes Received:
    123
    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2010
    Maybe you should come here and see what it's actually like?

    We're all riding horses, and have oil derricks in our back yards. Everyone gets a free 10 gallon hat.


    So what you're saying is that if you don't agree with how a person teaches and raises their child, and if that child grows up to become someone who believes in something drastically differing from your own experiences and teachings, then they're completely wrong?

    Because that's what you're saying.


    There is nothing wrong with being whatever passes as a political stance these days. It's just differing ideals and actions to solve the same problems. People just want to vilify everything they can to make themselves, and their own understandings the "right" way.
     
  15. pink freud

    pink freud SS.org Regular

    Messages:
    4,108
    Likes Received:
    496
    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2009
    For some reason Texas has more influence over national education than they should. Texas textbooks seem to end up being national textbooks.
     
  16. Sicarius

    Sicarius Reggie J Worthington

    Messages:
    3,020
    Likes Received:
    123
    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2010
    Because of our population density, we order more books than probably any other state, so they tend to send it out our versions to other states as a "default" but I think there are other versions of text books for other states.

    There's nothing wrong with teaching creationism in school. If you don't agree with it, then be a parent and educate your kids.

    Personally I don't think religion should be taught to kids until they're 10 or older, so that they can decide for themselves, instead of being raised into something.

    But that's just me, I'm not going to go around bitching and complaining about "indoctrination of the youth". It's not my place to tell a parent what to do and what not to do with their kids.

    Parents need to step up and interact with their own damn kids, and teach them right from wrong, and let the children decide for themselves what they should believe.
     
  17. pink freud

    pink freud SS.org Regular

    Messages:
    4,108
    Likes Received:
    496
    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2009
    Teaching creationism in public schools violates the establishment clause. That means there is something wrong with it.
     
  18. Sicarius

    Sicarius Reggie J Worthington

    Messages:
    3,020
    Likes Received:
    123
    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2010
    Establishment Clause - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    How so?
    1) There is no established national religion as done by Congress.
    2) The US Government has no say so in what goes into a text book.

    Also, if you'd like to take a gander at this article (be careful it's written by someone in Texas!)
    Texas Textbooks' National Influence Is a Myth — State Board of Education | The Texas Tribune

    Books are tailor made for the area that is being taught. We have no honest say so what goes into books anymore. Though I'm sure there are states in the South that use a similar version of our books, it fits with the sympathies and ideologies of the bible belt.


    Have you seen the section on Creationism in a science book? You realize it's not even 3 paragraphs long? It's there as an acknowledgement that there are people who believe it, and then it goes right into the Theory of Evolution.

    Also: Please, neg me so much that I go into red. If having a different opinion because I live with in this state and actually see what's going on is too much for your opinions, then it's well worth it.
     
    AcousticMinja and Ryan-ZenGtr- like this.
  19. TemjinStrife

    TemjinStrife Power Metal Cellist

    Messages:
    5,101
    Likes Received:
    467
    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2007
    The reason there's so little discussion of Creationism in a science textbook is because Creationism is not scientific, nor is it even a scientific theory. Therefore, there's very little to discuss from a scientific perspective.

    Are we really going so far back to "Inherit The Wind" and the "Monkey Trials" of the 20s?
     
  20. Rick

    Rick ALL HAIL DJOD

    Messages:
    18,915
    Likes Received:
    1,485
    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2006
    Don't judge all of us Texans. :lol:
     

Share This Page