[David]

Originally Posted by jtm45

Hey Dave man!
Chill a bit dude!
While your theories may be a bit over the top i'm with you on your general opinons (call me mad,but i am).

Get a new hobby or start taking valium or something so you don't get yourself so worked up about stuff.

I don't really think anyone here is against you as a person David.
You're just a tad excitable,but generally good-hearted (i think?).

I think everyone knows I have anger problems, so they're lenient on me. I'm one of the people who wasn't hugged enough as a child.

[Drew]

Originally Posted by David

Actually, no, I'm not. I provided you with an answer to your question. Maybe the answer wasn't exactly what you'd prefer to hear for my arguement, but I replied. And you are guilty of this yourself. Since I don't have firm evidence, that 9/11 was an inside job, you won't believe it. Although, I do have plenty of facts and questions that can be used as soft evidence, and when compiled together, help make a point. I never stated that I had a firm arguement.

Also, I didn't counter your question by asking for firm proof that you are correct... infact, I asked the question first, and you were the one to counter it with asking me to prove my base.

You're missing the popint, David. The accepted theory is that Islamic terrorists were responsible for 9/11. You're disagreeing with that and getting upset that no ne's paying you any attention, so I asked you to provide firm evidence that it WAS the US government, since thats what you believe in light of the accepted view. You countered by asking me to prove it wasn't. When I called you out on it, all you did was accuse me of doing the same. Considering you're the one arguing against accepted opinion here, I'd say the burden of proof falls on your shoulders to offfer firm evidence that the US government orchestrated the attacks, which thus far you haven't done.

I'm giving you a chance to plead your case, and so far the best you've done is tell me to plead mine.

As for the video, noodles is right - that certainly doesn't prove that the US government targeted the pentagon. It doesn't even really prove an airplane didn't hit the building, as noodles points out that an airplane coasting into position for acrash landing puts outa LOT less thrust than one under full accelleration for takeoff, and all eyewitness accounts collaborate that the airplane didn't begin to rev its engines until the last couple seconds before impact, well after crossing the highway.

[Cyberi4n]

Originally Posted by David

I still think that if it had flown over the highway, that this would have happened to quite a few cars:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...42467252&hl=en

I wonder why they took the engine out of that truck?

[Drew]

Originally Posted by Cyberi4n

I wonder why they took the engine out of that truck?

Interesting, you're right.