![]() |
sevenstring guitars | sevenstring registry | photo gallery | |||
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
| - Pickup selection, wiring, technical questions & other guitar hardware discussion here. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
ss.org Regular
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Overland Park, KS
Posts: 32
Main Seven: Ibanez RG7321
Rig: Line 6 Vetta II
Thanked: 6 / 1
![]() |
I hope this is the right thread for this question....
I have a Jackson SL1 and an Ibanez RG7321...both have a 25.5" scale length, yet there is a substantial difference in string tension (especially on the E and A strings) for the exact same tuning and exact same strings (Ernie Ball super slinky). Am I just imagining this, or what? I don't think I am. On the Ibanez, I even upped the gauge to a 46 gauge on the E string. And even then, with a 46 on the E on the Ibanez and a 42 on the E on my jackson, the Ibanez STILL seems to have less tension. Is it because my jackson has a floyd rose and the Ibanez has a fixed bridge?
"Though I do not believe this is the right thing to do artistically, I do however believe that this is the right thing to do FI-NAN-CIAL-LY."
-Nathan Explosion |
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
prototyping...
![]() Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Vancouver, B.C., Canada
Posts: 3,690
Real Name: Leo Pedersen
Main Seven: Raven 7 - my design
Main ERG: Ergo 10, Ergo 9, Stick 8
Rig: 2101LTD>TS100>2x1936
Thanked: 36
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
There's no difference in the actual tension if you're using the same gages with the same scale-lengths. But the difference in feel, or bend-ability/flexibility, or perceived tension can certainly be attributed to your Jackson having a double-locking trem and your Ibanez not.
The looser feel of your Ibanez is due to the extra length of string past the nut and bridge that is available to stretch whenever you push or bend the strings. On your Jackson the strings are locked at both the bridge and nut and so only the 'playable' part of the strings can stretch. This would be especially noticeable for your fretting hand when playing on the low frets close to the nut. Noodles summed it up well in another thread: Quote:
There's a detailed thread on this issue here: http://www.sevenstring.org/forum/extended-range-guitars/10364-reverse-headstock-misconception.html including a good linked article on this post: http://www.sevenstring.org/forum/sho...1&postcount=32 |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
ss.org Regular
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Overland Park, KS
Posts: 32
Main Seven: Ibanez RG7321
Rig: Line 6 Vetta II
Thanked: 6 / 1
![]() |
Quote:
Thanks man, I was afraid nobody would answer me. That makes a good deal of sense, if I understand it properly. The tension is the same, but the perceived tension (which is what really matters) is different. This gives me a bit of insight into my problems. What originally led me to ask this is the following dilemma: On the high e, b and g strings, the Ibanez slaughters the Jackson in playability, in my opinion. This really pisses me off since the Jackson is about 4 times as expensive as my Ibanez. On the Ibanez, it’s easier to fret and the string tension is good for super fast picking without the string moving around too much. (I play on 9’s). On the fretting, I don’t know whether it’s a perceived tension issue, the thickness of the neck, the fret size, fretboard radius… don’t know. I’m a pretty analytical guy, and it’s pretty frustrating that I can’t figure out why the two guitars play so differently. However, on the Ibanez, the lower strings have really poor perceived tension, to the point where I cannot even alt. pick them fast because they move around too much. I don’t like putting really large gauge strings on to compensate either…I’m not used to picking on thicker strings and I dislike the rounder sound they produce. Very frustrating. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
prototyping...
![]() Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Vancouver, B.C., Canada
Posts: 3,690
Real Name: Leo Pedersen
Main Seven: Raven 7 - my design
Main ERG: Ergo 10, Ergo 9, Stick 8
Rig: 2101LTD>TS100>2x1936
Thanked: 36
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Yeah, it's probably a harsh mod to try, but if you could find a way to lock the lower strings of your Ibanez while leaving the top 3 as they are then you could have the best of both worlds - this is the great advantage of multi-scale (fanned-fret) guitars btw.
You could try a Kahler locking nut which mounts behind the regular nut you already have - then you could just lock the lowest 3 or 4 strings and leave your highest 3 loose. This would help. http://www.wammiusa.com/kahler%20systems.html |
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Need help with tension on a schetcer | Desecrated | Beginner Central | 10 | 10-13-2006 07:24 PM |
| High Tension | noodles | Movies, Books, TV & Media | 4 | 06-21-2006 06:05 PM |
| Pinky Tension | 777 | Music Theory, Lessons & Techniques | 1 | 05-16-2006 02:21 PM |
| Low string tension/sound question | Nik | Pickups, Electronics & General Tech | 6 | 04-06-2006 10:20 PM |
![]() | |
![]()
![]()
![]()
|
Powered by vBulletin 3.7.3 Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0 "777" Logo © Darren Wilson Privacy Policy Affiliate Links Directory ![]()
|