![]() |
sevenstring guitars | sevenstring registry | photo gallery | subscription | spy | |||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
| Pickups, Electronics & General Tech Pickup selection, wiring, technical questions & other guitar hardware discussion here. |
3Likes
![]() |
| LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
SS.org Regular
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Thunder Bay
Posts: 718
Thanked: 7
![]() Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
Help! intonation!
I just bought a Schecter SLS C-7 and replaced the 56 with a 60 so I could tune the B to A without losing the "tight" feeling I like. I went to intonate, 'cause obviously the 60 was sharp...but I didn't have enough slack! So I flipped the tom saddle thing for the lowest string around, and tried to intonate it again. Still not enough slack! that low A is still sharp.
What can I do? Adjust the truss rod? change the height of the TOM ? thanks guys |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
__________________
This advertising will not be shown in this way to registered members. Register your free account today and become a member on Sevenstring.org |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
SS.org Regular
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Hungary
Posts: 843
Thanked: 26
![]() ![]() ![]() Feedback Score: 7 reviews
|
I can't think of anything else but a compensated nut.
Earvana - Compensated Tuning Systems for Guitars ESP 7-string Shelf Nut (48 mm and E-E 1.594), $35. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
SS.org Regular
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Thunder Bay
Posts: 718
Thanked: 7
![]() Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
Hmmm, I'll look into it!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canadia
Posts: 19,984
Thanked: 338
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Feedback Score: 10 reviews
|
Wait, what do you mean by slack? You need to move the saddle back or forth to adjust intonation, not the truss rod.
I think you can buy shorter saddles for ToM's if the saddle you have won't move far back enough, although not being able to move your saddle back enough for a low A would be a HUGE mistake on Schecter's part which I can't see them making... |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
SS.org Regular
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Thunder Bay
Posts: 718
Thanked: 7
![]() Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
Would going back to a 56 and raising the action a bit work?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
SS.org Regular
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Hungary
Posts: 843
Thanked: 26
![]() ![]() ![]() Feedback Score: 7 reviews
|
This won't save the 7th string from being loose. Even on a baritone, I wouldn't tune a .056 to A.
But that's your guitar and your preferences, this might work for you eventually.Anyway, TOM bridges do have a reputation, intonation may be hard to set when tuning down. A hipshot style regular bridge has more room for the saddle, TOMs have stronger limitations. Maybe that's the case for your guitar, and either you'll have to go back to 56 and cope with a loose string, or you'll have to try a compensated nut. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canadia
Posts: 19,984
Thanked: 338
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Feedback Score: 10 reviews
|
Umm no, why would he need a compensated nut? Just use a thicker string, if there's enough room to intonate (which I imagine there would be for a 7 string ToM
) then you're good to go, if not buy a shorter saddle. You most definately DO NOT need a compensated nut.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
SS.org Regular
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Odense; Denmark
Posts: 1,103
Thanked: 5 / 1
![]() Feedback Score: 5 reviews
|
^It seems to me that the problem is that he HAS a thicker string, and NOT enough room to intonate, so a compensated nut might be just what he needs. I personally think they're very nice in any case...
I once saw someone on another forum make a saddle like this: ![]() That's something to look into. I don't think you can buy them anywhere, so contact a machinist if you can. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
SS.org Regular
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Thunder Bay
Posts: 718
Thanked: 7
![]() Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
I lowered the TOM bridge and managed to reset it all up and work
that was a bit random though...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Melodic Mamma Jamma
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 1,164
Thanked: 7
![]() Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
Why do you keep mentioning action like it has anything to do with the intonation? Move the bridge up or down its still gonna have the same problem...
Guess im glad whatever your problem actually was has been resolved..
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
SS.org Regular
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Norfolk, VA
Posts: 1,715
Thanked: 31
![]() ![]() Feedback Score: 1 reviews
|
^^^ Well , it does slightly change the intonation when you raise/lower your bridge, but still agreed, I can't imagine it'd be enough to make a difference if you're saddle is running out of room.
Ibanez ARZ307, SA32EX Gibson LPJ, Squire II frankenstrat of doom Dual Recto Rev G,6505+, B-52 AT-100 POD XT Pro, Velocity 100 |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
SS.org Regular
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: The middle of a corn field, IN
Posts: 1,443
Thanked: 9
![]() ![]() Feedback Score: 3 reviews
|
I could be wrong but think what he means is because he can't achieve proper intonation with a larger string then he could just use a small string but with higher action, thus decreasing/ eliminating fret buzz.
"At least Deathcore was heavy as shit when done right, this new stuff sounds like if meshuggah and taking back sunday had a homosexual he/she creature when bred together." -- Some dude on youtube |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
SS.org Regular
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Thunder Bay
Posts: 718
Thanked: 7
![]() Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
So I've got my guitar intonated now, A-E-A-D-G-B-e. It's a standard 10-46 set with a low 60 for the "A". My new problem is that the lowest string simply sounds flat. Like not musically, but flat as in dead. Lifeless. Now the 60 isn't from the set, I just threw it on while trying tensions and decided I liked it more than some of the heavier ones I had in mind.
Could it be a dead string? Is it something to do with action? I am unsure, I have never encountered this before. Any help is greatly appreciated? EDIT: for reference, it's a 26.5 inch scale, TOM bridge with string thru body. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canadia
Posts: 19,984
Thanked: 338
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Feedback Score: 10 reviews
|
I use a .59 for a low A on my 26.5 and it sounds fine, maybe its an old string.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
SS.org Regular
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Thunder Bay
Posts: 718
Thanked: 7
![]() Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
SS.org Regular
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: NSW, Australia
Posts: 313
Thanked: 3
![]() Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
...and that is just one of the reasons that I hate ToM bridges. That, and the fact that they tear the side of my picking hand to pieces.
For future reference, I think Schaller make a replacement for the TOM (called a roller bridge iirc) which has a greater range of adjustment available on it. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|