![]() |
sevenstring guitars | sevenstring registry | photo gallery | subscription | spy | |||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
| Pickups, Electronics & General Tech Pickup selection, wiring, technical questions & other guitar hardware discussion here. |
![]() |
| LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
The Tooth Fairy
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: London, ON (Canada)
Posts: 1,204
Thanked: 51
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Feedback Score: 2 reviews
|
EMG neck position pickup...I hate my tone.
I've been having a bit of a problem recently which I believe requires immediate rectification.
I HATE the sound of my neck position EMG's. i have the 85 and 60 in my two main guitars. For cleans, i think they add a lot of life to my XXX's clean channel (which isn't the best to start with) but for my distorted tones, when I switch to that pickup, the sound I get just...sucks. I thought about trying the 18v mod, to see if that helps, or maybe using the 81 in the neck position as well. You can kinda hear what I mean in this video: Entire vid played on an EMG 60 in the neck. Is there something I've missed that I need to try? I might try to get it recorded eventually, but GHAH this is frustrating. |
|
|
|
| Thanked by: |
|
|
|
|
__________________
This advertising will not be shown in this way to registered members. Register your free account today and become a member on Sevenstring.org |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
SS.org Regular
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Leeds, UK
Posts: 135
Thanked: 0
![]() Feedback Score: 2 reviews
|
I have exactly the same thing in my 1527. I originally had an 81-7 in the bridge and a 707 in the neck and hated it. Swapped 'em round and hate it less, but I'm not fond (I foolishly replaced an Air Norton 7 with this, just to rub salt into the wound!)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: ny
Posts: 2,381
Thanked: 46
![]() ![]() Feedback Score: 22 reviews
|
Try an HA. I really like EMG's single coils.
But I gotta admit, I thought that sounded pretty damn good!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
SS.org Regular
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: ON, Canada
Posts: 315
Thanked: 6
![]() Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
have you tried the 85 in the neck slot? might give you what you're looking for. the 85 is capable of doing a thick and harmonically rich tone when height gets tweaked, this is a setup I use in my RG321MH and it works out very well. I spend the most time on the neck pickup as it sounds that good (although I can't beat the 81 in the bridge for distorted rhythm sounds) no matter what I use it for (from jazz cleans to shred appropriate tones)
for what it's worth it the 60 does sound really good in the vid, but if it's not the tone you're shooting for then by all means tweak/change until you find it |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Scumbag of the Earth
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: wa
Posts: 436
Thanked: 7
![]() Feedback Score: 1 reviews
|
well how about nevermind
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Italy
Posts: 730
Thanked: 16
![]() ![]() ![]() Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
I love the 60 in the neck. this video confirms my love, to me it just sounds good, and much better than the 85, 81 or blackout neck. haven't tried the new blackouts ahb-3.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
SS.org Regular
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: SE
Posts: 855
Thanked: 2
![]() Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
Definitely 85 or 89 in the neck if you're going EMG and not the 60. EMG 81 sounds crap in the neck IMO, way too hot and way too sterile.
Nice playing by the way but get rid of the silly cheater hair-tie
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 739
Thanked: 17
![]() ![]() Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
Honestly, i'd go for an active (81 in the bridge) and a passive (neck position) setup. I'm about to take out my 85 and put an air norton in it's place.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Serious cuntage
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Springfield Missouri
Posts: 456
Thanked: 6
![]() Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
SS.org Regular
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: SE
Posts: 855
Thanked: 2
![]() Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
What do you think smiley's were invented for?
![]() Although I will always have less respect for a players technique when they have a dampening device, no matter what your name is, Guthrie Govan, Greg Howe or if you're just a youtube guitarist. As a musican I don't lose respect but for the technical ability I do. Anyway back on topic, I saw someone recommend a active/passive combo. Personally I find that it's too big difference with that. I would rather go all passive but if I were to stay active, a EMG 85 would sound smoother than the EMG 60. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
SS Contributor
![]() Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: San Diego/El Dorado Hills CA
Posts: 4,167
Thanked: 51
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Feedback Score: 9 reviews
|
I really liked that tone
![]() You could try an HA or switch to passives (but that wouldn't make sense if you like everything else about your EMGs). |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|