homepage   sevenstring guitars   sevenstring registry   photo gallery   subscription   spy 
Sevenstring.org - The Seven String Guitar Authority
Go Back   SevenString.org > Music Discussion > Luthiery, Modifications & Customizations
LIKE SS.org on Facebook FOLLOW SS.org on Twitter
  
Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By BlackMastodon

Reply
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 06-22-2012, 07:51 PM   #1
SS.org Regular
 
nkri's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: West Warwick, RI, USA
Posts: 281
Thanked: 2
nkri is a jewel in the rough
Feedback Score: 9 reviews
Moving bridge back for proper intonation

I'm in the process of refinishing my 7621 (pics coming soon), and I usually tune this guitar to A standard. The saddle for the low A doesn't move back far enough (even after removing the spring that keeps the saddle in place), so I'm planning to install the bridge farther back on the body to achieve proper intonation with low strings.

My question is, how far back should I move it? I want it far back enough that I could correctly intonate a .062 in A (and maybe .068 in G) but still be able to move the treble saddles forward enough to intonate properly in standard tuning. So how far back should I move the bridge? 0.25"? 0.5"? More/less?
Thanks,
Dan

PS: I'm not trying to change the scale length here, since that's determined by the distance between the nut and 12th fret...just want enough clearance with the saddles to intonate everything the way it should be.
nkri is offline   Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Seven String

Beitrag Sponsored Links

__________________
This advertising will not be shown in this way to registered members.
Register your free account today and become a member on SevenString.org
   
Unread 06-22-2012, 08:06 PM   #2
Banned
 
bob123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Michigan
Posts: 2,687
Thanked: 54
bob123 is a splendid one to beholdbob123 is a splendid one to beholdbob123 is a splendid one to beholdbob123 is a splendid one to beholdbob123 is a splendid one to behold
Feedback Score: 6 reviews
God this is gonna be a painful experience.

How far off is the intonation? what size strings are you using?

You may just need to adjust bridge angle back not necessarily the whole thing.
bob123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 06-22-2012, 08:36 PM   #3
SS.org Regular
 
nkri's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: West Warwick, RI, USA
Posts: 281
Thanked: 2
nkri is a jewel in the rough
Feedback Score: 9 reviews
Quote:
Originally Posted by bob123 View Post
God this is gonna be a painful experience.

How far off is the intonation? what size strings are you using?

You may just need to adjust bridge angle back not necessarily the whole thing.
lol, painful experience? How so? I'd estimate it was off by somewhere between a quarter tone and half step, so it's not like I need an extra inch or something. I was thinking (and hoping) 0.25" should be ok, just concerned about the high strings when I'm back in standard. In B, I use 10-46 + 58; in A, 11-49 + 62.

I'd rather adjust the whole bridge than the angle...aside from it looking pretty goofy, I don't wanna be bending the strings over the saddles at a weird angle...i.e., the strings are supposed to go parallel to the saddles, but if I changed the angle of the bridge, the saddles would be diagonal while the strings would be straight with the neck...that would create issues with setup and string breakage that I don't even wanna think about dealing with.
nkri is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 06-23-2012, 12:16 AM   #4
\m/ (゚Д゚) \m/
 
BlackMastodon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Windsor, ON
Posts: 3,989
Thanked: 21
BlackMastodon is a splendid one to beholdBlackMastodon is a splendid one to beholdBlackMastodon is a splendid one to beholdBlackMastodon is a splendid one to beholdBlackMastodon is a splendid one to behold
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Hmmm not sure how far back you will need to move it but I do highly recommend you tune the guitar to standard (or the highest tuning you will use with it) and intonate it with that tuning and see how much you would be able to get away with from there.

Another thing my guitar tech told me when I asked him about a similar problem was that you can add a small shim in the neck pocket to push the neck forward a bit and then intonate it from there, but I think this method is more for if you are just a smidge off from being properly intonated. What you're describing will probably need more.
bob123 likes this.

"Metal is for Vikings; if you're not a Viking, get off the boat." - The Beard

"He doesn't even like Metallica, that's how metal he is." - My friend describing my musical tastes to her friends.
BlackMastodon is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 06-23-2012, 12:57 AM   #5
Banned
 
schecter4life's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Clinton, TN
Posts: 364
Thanked: 13
schecter4life is a jewel in the rough
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
if your bridge is a flat-mount with 4 screws holding it in, pop a couple washers under the bridge for the 2 screws closest to the bridge pickup, re adjust your action, and that slight angle of the bridge may be enough to correct your intonation, i have NO idea if this will work, but in my minds logic it seems like it would.. i would give this idea a shot before potentially ruining the playability of a perfectly fine instrument
schecter4life is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 06-23-2012, 08:39 AM   #6
SS.org Regular
 
geeman8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Danville, VA
Posts: 138
Thanked: 10 / 1
geeman8 has a spectacular aura about
Feedback Score: 6 reviews
You know....Caparison did something similar to what you are trying to accomplish. I forget the name for the particular series of guitars, but they intentionally placed the bridge further back. These guitars came in drop B tuning I believe. They only changed the positioning of the bridge by a few millimeters though...nothing too drastic.
geeman8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 06-23-2012, 09:44 AM   #7
..to pay the beels
 
skeels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: milwaukee,WI
Posts: 3,572
Thanked: 40
skeels is rather kvlt and tr00. \m/skeels is rather kvlt and tr00. \m/skeels is rather kvlt and tr00. \m/skeels is rather kvlt and tr00. \m/skeels is rather kvlt and tr00. \m/skeels is rather kvlt and tr00. \m/skeels is rather kvlt and tr00. \m/
Feedback Score: 24 reviews
^ this. Only a slight change is needed.

Look at hipshots with short saddles on the low strings.
skeels is online now   Reply With Quote
Unread 06-23-2012, 11:36 AM   #8
Is beardless....
 
espman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Airdrie, Alberta
Posts: 2,073
Thanked: 11
espman is just really niceespman is just really nice
Feedback Score: 4 reviews
Quote:
Originally Posted by geeman8 View Post
You know....Caparison did something similar to what you are trying to accomplish. I forget the name for the particular series of guitars, but they intentionally placed the bridge further back. These guitars came in drop B tuning I believe. They only changed the positioning of the bridge by a few millimeters though...nothing too drastic.
That was the HGS series, they moved the bridge back by 3mm, tuned to B standard.

.backwards sentences say to used I .again go I there !shit Oh.

Please DO NOT start a new thread every time Rondo/Agile does something
espman is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 06-25-2012, 06:13 AM   #9
SS.org Regular
 
WiseSplinter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Cape Town - South Africa
Posts: 350
Thanked: 5
WiseSplinter is just really niceWiseSplinter is just really nice
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
I've heard of people removing the saddle of the low string and grinding it down a little at the rear, thereby allowing it to move slightly further back.
Not sure if this would work for your particular bridge but it might be worth it to check before doing anything more drastic.
The thought of cutting new holes in the top gives me the chills...

WiseSplinter is online now   Reply With Quote
Unread 06-25-2012, 09:57 AM   #10
SS.org Regular
 
nkri's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: West Warwick, RI, USA
Posts: 281
Thanked: 2
nkri is a jewel in the rough
Feedback Score: 9 reviews
Quote:
Originally Posted by WiseSplinter View Post
I've heard of people removing the saddle of the low string and grinding it down a little at the rear, thereby allowing it to move slightly further back.
Not sure if this would work for your particular bridge but it might be worth it to check before doing anything more drastic.
The thought of cutting new holes in the top gives me the chills...

Cutting holes is the part I'm least worried about. I'm veneering the top anyway, and it's very easy to fill holes with wood filler so it's not a big deal. This project goes much deeper than simply moving the bridge...I'm veneering the top/back/headstock, rewiring it with a 3-way switch and no tone pot, and replacing the inlays with abalone. So it's not a big deal to drill a few holes in the body. I decided to move the bridge back 0.25", and I'll just replace the treble saddle screws with longer ones if the saddles can't move forward far enough
nkri is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07-02-2012, 06:37 PM   #11
Banned
 
loki's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Florida
Posts: 17
Thanked: 0
loki can only hope to improve
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Quote:
Originally Posted by WiseSplinter View Post
I've heard of people removing the saddle of the low string and grinding it down a little at the rear, thereby allowing it to move slightly further back.
Not sure if this would work for your particular bridge but it might be worth it to check before doing anything more drastic.
The thought of cutting new holes in the top gives me the chills...

exactly...

i could be mistaken but i believe the position of each fret is calculated by the total length of the scale. moving the neck back is going to throw off that calculation. you might achieve intonation at the 12th fret but your other frets will be thrown off. you would need a new neck to match the new scale length.

modifying the bridge while maintaining the same scale length is the only realistic option.
loki is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07-02-2012, 08:28 PM   #12
not quite a shredder
 
VBCheeseGrater's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Hampton Roads
Posts: 2,827
Thanked: 45
VBCheeseGrater is a name known to allVBCheeseGrater is a name known to allVBCheeseGrater is a name known to allVBCheeseGrater is a name known to all
Feedback Score: 2 reviews
Quote:
Originally Posted by loki View Post
exactly...

i could be mistaken but i believe the position of each fret is calculated by the total length of the scale. moving the neck back is going to throw off that calculation. you might achieve intonation at the 12th fret but your other frets will be thrown off. you would need a new neck to match the new scale length.
I was thinking this too, but the more i think about it, maybe not. If the 12th fret is in the exact middle of nut/saddle (meaning perfectly intonated), the frets should line up perfectly. The frets are laid out with the assumption that the 12th fret is dead center, so it should be good i'm thinking - someone correct me if i'm wrong.

Ibanez ARZ307, ICEMAN IC400, RG921F-BK
Frknstrt of Doom, MIM FSR Strat
POD HD Pro, Mesa 50/50, Recto 2x12,1x12,Theile
Randall RD20 Diavlo + V30 1x12
VBCheeseGrater is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:03 AM.


Our Network: PRS Guitar Forum | Luthier Forum | SG Guitar Forum | Les Paul Forum | Marshall Amp Forum | Acoustic Guitar Forum

SS.org proudly supports St. Jude Children's Research Hospital

Copyright © 2004-2014, SevenString.org. All Rights Reserved.