![]() |
sevenstring guitars | sevenstring registry | photo gallery | subscription | spy | |||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
| Guitar Reviews Sevenstring.org's fully interactive guitar review database. |
![]() |
| LinkBack | Review Tools | Display Modes |
|
Dorkness's Agile Interceptor Review.
Published by Cancer
04-17-2006 |
|||
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
#1
By
nyck
on
04-17-2006, 03:51 PM
|
|
The part about the nut is correct. It's about a mm too long. I fixed this by putting wood in the screw down parts, then rescrewing in the nut. This fixed it pretty well.
As for the high bass side nut, it almost drove me CRAZY. Until I realized I could just take off the nut and sand down the ebony behind the nut! This solved the problem perfectly and the guitar plays so much more better on rhythm. About the trem baseplate problem. I have come accross this too! The action can't go too low on the guitar because of the trem base route. It's too shallow like you said. Another option to what you said as a solution would be to put on a shim in the neck pocket under the neck between the bottom of the neck joint and the bottom of the neck butt. If you want medium-low action, then you shouldn't care because this is pretty accessable without the trem grinding. You cannot get uber low action unless you route the base plate area more or put a shim in the neck pocket. This is all problems with the trem if you actually 'use' it. I have the trem blocked because I really don't use a trem that much to justify having it floating. With the trem blocked, you can get pretty low action. I would want the option to go lower anyway though. I will be adding a shim in the neck pocket pretty soon. The neck shape is pretty horrid imo. I enjoy Ibanez flat-thin necks and this definetly doesn't satisfy me. I plan on sanding down the back of the neck to get it more flat and thin in a few days. I'll be putting Tung oil on it as well. I agree with the sound. I found this guitar to sound incredible. With the right settings, it can sound HUGE. I like dialing in a nu metal scoop sound just for fun because it does it so well. You can get great versitile sounds with all the electronics. |
|
|
|
#2
By
Cancer
on
04-17-2006, 04:08 PM
|
|
|
Quote:
After seeing some other reviews and pics, I'm pretty convinced that there was and "a" and "b" batch in this revision. Perhaps we caught a day when the neck machine was off, I dunno. Thing is I'm used to it now so it doesn't bother me and I knew I was taking a chance by buying a guitar sight unseen. Had Dorki had been in a music store, I wouldn't have purchased her, but despite that I'm still interested in the future of where this thing is going to go, if they fix the issues, or increase quality control, the Interceptor line will crush, and I'm really interested in getting something that I kinda call my own. It's like I said before, the issues are small, but in this day and age, especially since we know these are stamped out by machine (which I'm fine with), the consumer shouldn't have to settle with them, repair it himslef, or get a luthier to do it. I should be able to get a box, make some action adjustments and go. Luckily Rondo Music has an awesome return policy so (and if they had more Interceptors Io might go for it) I refuse to complain but so much. Really at this point, I'm trying to bitch, as much as trying to help. |
|
|
|
|
#8
By
Cancer
on
04-17-2006, 06:47 PM
|
|
|
Quote:
My only problem with this is that the neck pocket is so perfect, I don't want to mess with it, although it is a much simpler solution than re-routing the frontal trem cavity, or the other solution, getting new slightly thicker trem posts, and removing the trem support plate altogether (which, if you got an OFR, you'd end up doing anyway). I had thought about just removing the trem support plate and getting some cheap post, but the predrilled post holes aren't tight enough (the trem support bar slid oout with ZERO effort, and is actually held down by 2 very tiny screws), and I have a feeling that would be a future issue. |
|
|
|
|
#13
By
Cancer
on
04-18-2006, 02:56 PM
|
|
|
Quote:
Cool, I for one, am curious to read your thoughts on it. |
|
|
|
|
#16
By
nyck
on
04-18-2006, 08:44 PM
|
|
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#18
By
David
on
04-18-2006, 10:22 PM
|
|
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#20
By
Cancer
on
04-18-2006, 10:37 PM
|
||
|
Quote:
Despite my review (which I'm hoping didn''t come off as negative), I'd still buy one, and anyone who was thinking about one, I'd still say go for it, I posted what I posted to make everyone here aware, but (and no I'm not screaming) IT'S STILL A KICKASS GUITAR FOR THE PRICE. Send it through the regular setup process (fret level, neck adjust, etc), and I guarantee youi will have a nice guitar. Quote:
Another thing thats been in the back of my mind too, the price difference is only 10$!?!??!? Now simple logic tells me that being the trem and added wood, the difference should be more than 10 bucks. Someone gotta really hate trems to pass that up, or perhaps the issues were known beforehand, and they were priced to move. Again, I'm not hatin', just wonderin'. My personal opinion, I think the 25.5 Septor should go bye bye, and Ronda should make ALL of their 7 string 27", and maybe sink the hardtail like Noodles's KXK (awesome idea btw, making it so that the trem and hardtail feel the same). Now that would be cool. |
||
|
|
|
#22
By
SILENT FACTOR
on
04-20-2006, 10:36 AM
|
|
Yea, what is with that? Great review by the way!
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Review Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|