View Single Post
Old 12-17-2007, 05:17 PM   #11
Drew
Fear the Polo!
 
Drew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Somerville, MA
Posts: 21,267

Real Name: Call me Ahab...
Main Seven: 1991 Ibanez UV7PWH
Main ERG: Sherman 5-string bass
Rig: Mesa Recto-verb 50

Thanked: 141

Drew is Odin incarnateDrew is Odin incarnateDrew is Odin incarnateDrew is Odin incarnateDrew is Odin incarnateDrew is Odin incarnateDrew is Odin incarnateDrew is Odin incarnateDrew is Odin incarnateDrew is Odin incarnateDrew is Odin incarnateDrew is Odin incarnateDrew is Odin incarnateDrew is Odin incarnateDrew is Odin incarnate
Have you looked at ways to get more mileage out of the arpeggios you already know?

Let's start VERY basic. Look at the notes in a Cmaj9 arpeggio: C E G B D

Now, because extended chords, in standard tertiary western harmony, are composed of stacked triads, be they simple triads or complicated chords with many additions, it stands to reason that if you're building up a third at a time, you can simply break any of those chords down to sub-triads and capture much of that sound, correct? So, here we really have three triads:

C E G - C major
E G B - E minor
G B D - G major.

So, if you're playing over a Cmaj9 chord, then any of those arpeggios will contain viable chord tones. An Em arpeggio against a C will suggest Cmaj7 (C E G B), whereas a G major over C will suggest Cmaj9 (C (E implied) G B D).

Likewise, if you want to imply a C7 harmony against a C, change that Em arpeggio to an Edim triad (E G Bb) and you're there. Do a fully diminished 7th arpeggio (E G Bb C#) and you imply a C7b9.

Against a C, a G minor chord, meanwhile ( G, Bb, D) would give you a G9 tonality.

You get the idea. Really, you can cover a LOT of ground with simple triad arpeggios if you learn your augmented and diminished patterns as well. Large 6 note arpeggios may be cool and all, but by then you might as well be playing scales...

"...and everything under the sun is in tune, but the sun is eclipsed by the moon."
View Drew's Photo Album Offline   Reply With Quote
 
Page generated in 0.10692 seconds with 11 queries