Quote:
Originally Posted by ibznorange
i think it sort of went the recto because someone mentioned "Mark IV" and "versatility", and we all sorta just went lol and took the recto as the mesa versatile option. Id agree with you in that the Sig:X is even more versatile, but the rectos do NOT lack versatility at all, despite common conception. Just if the Sig:x is anything like the Ultralead, its versatility is fucking ridiculous is all.
Mark IV's on the other hand...  |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Drew
I suspect it was right about post #9, where the original poster mentioned he was also after the sort of low gain stuff a Recto couldn't do.  |
Yea I know that smartass
I meant I'm not sure why it's permanently changed into the usual "Rectos sound good for low gain" discussion like seemingly every other thread haha. Wanted to get back to the original topic.
The bottom line is, Rectos sound good and are more versatile than people think, we all agree. However, those who are familiar with the Sig:X or others from the Pittbull line can attest that there's no comparison in terms of versatility and tone shaping flexibility.
Tone of course is subjective. Obviously I think the VHT's smoke Mesas in both low and high-gain applications, but only real-world experience for the original poster can determine whether he'll agree with that.