Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMissing  I've said it before, i'll say it again... If she Bull-Moose's this election, i'm going to be PISSED. |
It is a real dilemma that has negatives and positives, no matter which way it goes.
If she wins and destroys the party's chances in November, then the backlash will be so great that the DNC will have to get rid of these ridiculous superdelegates. Unfortunately, this means we have to deal with four more years of a stubborn GOP president who refuses to pull out of Iraq, and 40+ GOP Senators who will filibuster any legislation that is meant to end it.
If she looses, then the DNC will point at the success of the superdelegate system, and we'll be stuck with it. There will be no discussion about how Obama and the DNC could have saved plenty of time and money focusing on the real candidate months ago, since Clinton would have been forced to drop out when it was proven to be mathematically impossible for her to win the pledged delegate count.
This is why I hate the two party system. On one side, we have a bunch of stubborn morons who want to force their moral stance down our throats, while fighting the entire world and bankrupting anyone who is not a millionaire. On the other side, we have the fucking keystone cops, bumbling around, trying to pick up a clue, in danger of losing to a frail old non-incumbent of the same party as the most unpopular and ineffective president in the history of our nation. I don't get it, was the Nazi party not fielding a candidate this year?